Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25195504›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of genetics2014

From egg to gastrula: how the cell cycle is remodeled during the Drosophila mid-blastula transition.

Jeffrey A Farrell, Patrick H O'Farrell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 130 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeffrey A FarrellDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138; email: jfarrell@g.harvard.edu.
Patrick H O'Farrell

Funding

Developmental Programs of Cell Cycle ControlR37GM037193 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI O'FARRELL, PATRICK H · 2010 to 2019
$4.8M
MOLECULAR DETERMINANTS OF DEVELOPMENTAL FATER01GM037193 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI O'FARRELL, PATRICK H · 1986 to 2009
$4.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM037193NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037193NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM037193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many, if not most, embryos begin development with extremely short cell cycles that exhibit unusually rapid DNA replication and no gap phases. The commitment to the cell cycle in the early embryo appears to preclude many other cellular processes that only emerge as the cell cycle slows just prior to gastrulation at a major embryonic transition known as the mid-blastula transition (MBT). As reviewed here, genetic and molecular studies in Drosophila have identified changes that extend S phase and introduce a post-replicative gap phase, G2, to slow the cell cycle. Although many mysteries remain about the upstream regulators of these changes, we review the core mechanisms of the change in cell cycle regulation and discuss advances in our understanding of how these might be timed and triggered. Finally, we consider how the elements of this program may be conserved or changed in other organisms.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlastulaCell CycleCell DivisionDrosophilaEmbryo, NonmammalianFemaleGastrulaGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalOvarycell cycleDrosophilaG2maternal-zygotic transitionMBTreplication

Identifiers

PMID25195504
PMCPMC4484755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.