Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25195131›Full record

SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014

Analysis of circulating microRNA biomarkers for breast cancer detection: a meta-analysis.

Lihua Liu, Shan Wang, Xiutang Cao, Jianchao Liu

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lihua LiuInstitute of Hospital Management and Research, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China, liulihua_pla@yeah.net.
Shan Wang
Xiutang Cao
Jianchao Liu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have been reported to be aberrantly expressed in patients with breast cancer (BC) and thus may serve as potential diagnostic biomarkers. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the potential diagnostic value of using circulating miRNAs for BC. The summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve was used to assess the overall diagnostic performance of circulating miRNA. All analyses were performed using STATA 12.0 software. Thirty-one studies from 16 publications with a total of 1,668 BC patients and 1,111 healthy controls were included in this meta-analysis. Our results showed that the pooled sensitivity (SEN) for miRNAs assays was 0.77 (95 % CI 0.69-0.84), specificity (SPE) was 0.88 (95 % CI 0.79-0.93), positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 4.2 (95 % CI 3.0-6.0), negative LR (NLR) was 0.29 (95 % CI 0.21-0.40), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 18 (95 % CI 10-32). The area under the SROC curve (AUC) was 0.89 (95 % CI 0.86-0.91). Subgroup analysis suggested that employing a combination of multiple miRNAs was better than using a single miRNA in SEN (0.88 vs. 0.69), SPE (0.88 vs. 0.89), PLR (6.3 vs. 3.3), NLR (0.14 vs. 0.41), DOR (48 vs. 10), and AUC (0.94 vs. 0.83). In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggested that the expression profiles of circulating miRNAs, especially using a combination of them, have potential to facilitate accurate breast tumor detection. However, there are still challenges that need to be addressed to establish these new biomarkers before they can be applied to routine clinical procedures.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMicroRNAsPublication BiasReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.