SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014
Analysis of circulating microRNA biomarkers for breast cancer detection: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- miRNA-143 as a potential biomarker in the detection of bladder cancer: a meta-analysis.Future oncology (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of diagnostic cell-free circulating microRNAs for breast cancer detection.BMC cancer · 2022Pooled it
- Diagnostic value of seven biomarkers for breast cancer: an overview with evidence mapping and indirect comparisons of diagnostic test accuracy.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2020Pooled it
- MiRNAs Predict the Prognosis of Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Plasma microRNA ratios associated with breast cancer detection in a nested case-control study from a mammography screening cohort.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Prognostic and diagnostic values of non-coding RNAs as biomarkers for breast cancer: An umbrella review and pan-cancer analysis.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Article
- MicroRNA Expression in Plasma of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients.Journal of Korean medical science · 2022Article
- Role of miRNAs in Neurodegeneration: From Disease Cause to Tools of Biomarker Discovery and Therapeutics.Genes · 2022Review
- The roles of ncRNAs in the diagnosis, prognosis and clinicopathological features of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have been reported to be aberrantly expressed in patients with breast cancer (BC) and thus may serve as potential diagnostic biomarkers. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the potential diagnostic value of using circulating miRNAs for BC. The summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve was used to assess the overall diagnostic performance of circulating miRNA. All analyses were performed using STATA 12.0 software. Thirty-one studies from 16 publications with a total of 1,668 BC patients and 1,111 healthy controls were included in this meta-analysis. Our results showed that the pooled sensitivity (SEN) for miRNAs assays was 0.77 (95 % CI 0.69-0.84), specificity (SPE) was 0.88 (95 % CI 0.79-0.93), positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 4.2 (95 % CI 3.0-6.0), negative LR (NLR) was 0.29 (95 % CI 0.21-0.40), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 18 (95 % CI 10-32). The area under the SROC curve (AUC) was 0.89 (95 % CI 0.86-0.91). Subgroup analysis suggested that employing a combination of multiple miRNAs was better than using a single miRNA in SEN (0.88 vs. 0.69), SPE (0.88 vs. 0.89), PLR (6.3 vs. 3.3), NLR (0.14 vs. 0.41), DOR (48 vs. 10), and AUC (0.94 vs. 0.83). In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggested that the expression profiles of circulating miRNAs, especially using a combination of them, have potential to facilitate accurate breast tumor detection. However, there are still challenges that need to be addressed to establish these new biomarkers before they can be applied to routine clinical procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25195131What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.