ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2015
The impact of hydrophobic hernia mesh coating by omega fatty acid on atraumatic fibrin sealant fixation.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- META Score: An International Consensus Scoring System on Mesh-Tissue Adhesions.World journal of surgery · 2020Guideline
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFibrin sealant (FS) is a safe and efficient fixation method in open intraperitoneal hernia repair. While favourable results have been achieved with hydrophilic meshes, hydrophobic (such as Omega fatty acid coated) meshes (OFM) have not been specifically assessed so far. Atrium C-qur lite(®) mesh was tested in rats in models of open onlay and intraperitoneal hernia repair.
methods44 meshes (2 × 2 cm) were implanted in 30 male Sprague-Dawley rats in open (n = 2 meshes per animal) and intraperitoneal technique (IPOM; n = 1 mesh per animal). Animals were randomised to four groups: onlay and IPOM sutured vs. sealed. Follow-up was 6 weeks, sutured groups serving as controls. Evaluation criteria were mesh dislocation, adhesions and foreign body reaction.
resultsFS provided a reliable fixation in onlay technique, whereas OFM meshes dislocated in the IPOM position when sealed only.
conclusionFS mesh fixation was safe with OFM meshes in open onlay repair. Intraperitoneal placement of hydrophobic meshes requires additional fixation and cannot be achieved with FS alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25194586What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.