ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2015
What does genetics tell us about imprinting and the placenta connection?
Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- FTDC1/2, oocyte-specific cofactors of DNMT1 required for epigenetic regulation and embryonic development.Cell death and differentiation · 2025Article
- Unraveling the mysteries of early embryonic arrest: genetic factors and molecular mechanisms.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Review
- Review
- Increased mtDNA mutation frequency in oocytes causes epigenetic alterations and embryonic defects.National science review · 2022Article
- Regulation of maternal-fetal metabolic communication.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021Review
- A genome-wide search for new imprinted genes in the human placenta identifies DSCAM as the first imprinted gene on chromosome 21.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2019Article
- No evidence for association ofClinical epigenetics · 2018Article
- Imprinted MicroRNA Gene Clusters in the Evolution, Development, and Functions of Mammalian Placenta.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Review
- Article
- Survival and growth of C57BL/6J mice lacking the BK channel,Physiological reports · 2017Article
- Placental Origins of Chronic Disease.Physiological reviews · 2016Review
- Pervasive polymorphic imprinted methylation in the human placenta.Genome research · 2016Article
- Allelome.PRO, a pipeline to define allele-specific genomic features from high-throughput sequencing data.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- The placenta: phenotypic and epigenetic modifications induced by Assisted Reproductive Technologies throughout pregnancy.Clinical epigenetics · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic gene silencing phenomenon that is specific to eutherians in the vertebrate lineage. The acquisition of both placentation and genomic imprinting has spurred interest in the possible evolutionary link for many years. In this review we examine the genetic evidence and find that while many imprinted domains are anchored by genes required for proper placenta development in a parent of origin fashion, an equal number of imprinted genes have no apparent function that depends on imprinting. Examination of recent data from studies of molecular and genetic mechanisms points to a maternal control of the selection and maintenance of imprint marks, reinforcing the importance of the oocyte in the healthy development of the placenta and fetus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.