Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25193963›Full record

Trial reportHaematologica2014

Secondary monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.

Marian F Schmitz, Henny G Otten, Laurens E Franssen, Suzanne van Dorp, Theo Strooisma, Henk M Lokhorst, Niels W C J van de Donk

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haematologica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marian F SchmitzDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht;
Henny G OttenLaboratory for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht;
Laurens E FranssenDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Hematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Suzanne van DorpDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht;
Theo StrooismaLaboratory for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht;
Henk M LokhorstDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Hematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Niels W C J van de DonkDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Hematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands n.vandedonk@vumc.nl.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the course of multiple myeloma, patients may develop a M-protein band different from the original: secondary monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. In this retrospective single center analysis, we describe the occurrence and clinical relevance of secondary monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (post-transplant monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance). A total of 138 patients who had undergone 139 allogeneic stem cell transplantations (39.6% in the upfront setting and 60.4% for relapsed multiple myeloma) were included in the study. Sixty-seven (48.2%) patients developed secondary monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, after a median latency of 6.9 months. Secondary monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance occurred more often in patients who achieved at least very good partial response after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, compared to partial response or less (54.8% vs. 26.5%; P=0.005). The incidence was also higher in the upfront setting as compared to relapsed disease, or with a sibling donor compared to matched unrelated donor, but less often after T-cell depletion. Importantly, development of post-transplant monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance as a time-dependent variable independently predicted for superior progression-free and overall survival (median progression-free survival 37.5 vs. 6.3 months, P<0.001; median overall survival 115.3 vs. 31.0 months, P=0.004). Clinicians should be aware of the benign nature of this phenomenon, and secondary monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance should not be confused with relapse or progression of disease. (Trial registered with trialregister.nl; HOVON 108: NTR 2958.).

Indexed as

AdultAgedDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMonoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined SignificanceMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingNetherlandsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID25193963
PMCPMC4258750
OpenAlexW2082727243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.