Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25193582›Full record

ReviewPharmacological research2014

Novel therapeutic strategies for ischemic heart disease.

Adam J Perricone, Richard S Vander Heide

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacological research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A review of protective effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adam J PerriconeLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, United States.
Richard S Vander HeideLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, United States. Electronic address: rvand3@lsuhsc.edu.

Funding

Genomic and Proteomic Architecture of AtherosclerosisR01HL111362 · NHLBI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HERRINGTON, DAVID MCLEOD · 2012 to 2021
$17.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL111362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite significant advances in the physician's ability to initiate myocardial reperfusion and salvage heart tissue, ischemic heart disease remains one of the leading causes of death in the United States. Consequently, alternative therapeutic strategies have been intensively investigated, especially methods of enhancing the heart's resistance to ischemic cell death - so called "cardioprotective" interventions. However, although a great deal has been learned regarding the methods and mechanisms of cardioprotective interventions, an efficacious therapy has yet to be successfully implemented in the clinical arena. This review discusses the current understanding of cardioprotection in the context of ischemic heart disease pathophysiology, highlighting those elements of ischemic heart disease pathophysiology that have received less attention as potential targets of cardioprotective intervention.

Indexed as

AnimalsCardiotonic AgentsCytoskeletonHumansMyocardial IschemiaSignal TransductionCardiotonic AgentsCardioprotectionCytoskeletal signalingIschemia–reperfusionIschemic preconditioningMyocardial infarctionReperfusion injury

Identifiers

PMID25193582
PMCPMC4182165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.