Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25193435›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2014

Early evaluation of the therapeutic effect of denosumab on tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b expression in a giant cell tumor of bone: a case report.

Naoto Watanabe, Seiichi Matsumoto, Takashi Shimoji, Keisuke Ae, Taisuke Tanizawa, Tabu Gokita, Noriko Motoi, Teruko Ueno, Mitsuru Koizumi

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naoto Watanabe
Seiichi Matsumoto
Takashi Shimoji
Keisuke Ae
Taisuke Tanizawa
Tabu Gokita
Noriko Motoi
Teruko Ueno
Mitsuru KoizumiNuclear Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan. mitsuru@jfcr.or.jp.
The Cancer Institute Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiant cell tumor of bone is an osteolytic, usually benign, tumor characterized by the infiltration of osteoclast-like giant cells. The receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand pathway has been shown to play a key role in the pathogenesis of giant cell tumor. Treatment for refractory, recurrent, or metastatic giant cell tumor remains challenging. A monoclonal antibody to receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand, denosumab, offers promise in these patients. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b, a bone resorption marker, is secreted from osteoclasts and this marker is reported to be high in patients with giant cell tumor of bone. We investigated the effects of denosumab and the usefulness of a tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b as a monitoring marker in the management of a refractory giant cell tumor of bone. CASE PRESENTATION: A 41-year-old Japanese male with right ischiac pain was diagnosed with a giant cell tumor in his right ischium. Since the tumor extended to the acetabulum, there was a possibility that en bloc resection might significantly impair function of the hip joint and curettage could cause massive bleeding. Therefore, denosumab therapy (120 mg, administered 3 times every 4 weeks) was performed before radical surgery. The giant cell tumor of bone was treated with denosumab successfully. No adverse reaction was noted. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b secretion was measured in the patient's serum to monitor the response to denosumab, and a rapid normalization of the marker was observed after the first denosumab administration.

conclusionThis case suggests that denosumab therapy might be an option for treating refractory giant cell tumor of bone, and that tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b might be an early marker with which to monitor the efficacy of denosumab therapy for refractory giant cell tumor.

Indexed as

Acid PhosphataseAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBone NeoplasmsDenosumabGiant Cell Tumor of BoneHumansIsoenzymesMaleTartrate-Resistant Acid PhosphataseTomography, X-Ray ComputedAcid PhosphataseAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDenosumabIsoenzymesTartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase

Identifiers

PMID25193435
PMCPMC4163159
OpenAlexW2028801931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.