Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25193280›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2015

Comparison of two techniques for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade in cats.

Agustina Ansón, Francisco G Laredo, Francisco Gil, Marta Soler, Eliseo Belda, Maria D Ayala, Amalia Agut

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Paravertebral brachial plexus blockade in cats: a cadaver study.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Agustina AnsónDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Francisco G LaredoDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Francisco GilDepartment of Veterinary Anatomy and Pathological Anatomy, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Marta SolerDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Eliseo BeldaDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Maria D AyalaDepartment of Veterinary Anatomy and Pathological Anatomy, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Amalia AgutDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain amalia@um.es.
Universidad de Murcia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Axillary blockade of the brachial plexus (BP) is advocated in humans and dogs for surgical procedures carried out on the foot, carpus and elbow as it provides complete analgesia distally from above the elbow joint. The aim of this study was to develop an ultrasound (US)-guided approach to block the BP in cats. Two groups of 12 feline cadavers each were used to compare two different techniques to block the BP at the axillary level. The reliability of the techniques was assessed by anatomical and computed tomography (CT) studies. Cadavers of the first group were positioned in dorsal recumbency with the forelimb to be blocked adducted (thoracic limbs flexed and orientated caudally) (FAD technique). The second group was positioned in dorsal recumbency with the forelimb abducted 90° (FAB technique). The accuracy of the techniques was determined by US after injecting 1 ml blue ink along the BP nerves, and by CT after injecting 1 ml of an iodinated contrast medium. The anatomical and CT studies confirmed the accuracy of the US location of the BP nerves. Staining of the axillaris, musculocutaneous, radialis, medianus and ulnaris nerves was observed in 100% of cats using the FAB technique and in 66% of the cats using the FAD technique. Rate of complications was higher in the FAD technique. In conclusion, a US-guided axillary approach to the BP by the use of a FAB technique is a safe and feasible procedure to block the BP in the cat. Further studies are needed to ascertain whether the technique can be applied in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrachial PlexusBrachial Plexus BlockCat DiseasesCatsNerve BlockRange of Motion, ArticularReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonography, Interventional

Identifiers

PMID25193280
PMCPMC10816794
OpenAlexW2032951383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.