ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2014
Implementation of a shared medication list: physicians' views on availability, accuracy and confidentiality.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Medication experience of aged patients and their family caregivers during transitions of care: a qualitative meta-synthesis.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025Pooled it
- Value Propositions for Digital Shared Medication Plans to Boost Patient-Health Care Professional Partnerships: Co-Design Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025Article
- Health professionals' experience and perceived obstacles with managing patients' medication information in Norway: cross-sectional survey.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Optimization of the Danish National Electronic Prescribing System to Improve Patient Safety: Development of a User-Friendly Prototype of the Digital Platform Shared Medication Record.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Discrepancies in patients' medication lists from pharmacies in Sweden: an interview study before the implementation of the Swedish National Medication List.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023Article
- Personal Electronic Records of Medications (PERMs) for medication reconciliation at care transitions: a rapid realist review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Review
- Current Knowledge about Providing Drug-Drug Interaction Services for Patients-A Scoping Review.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Challenges Faced by Health Professionals in Obtaining Correct Medication Information in the Absence of a Shared Digital Medication List.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Patients' Use and Perceptions of a Drug-Drug Interaction Database: A Survey of Janusmed Interactions.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Improving Primary Care Medication Processes by Using Shared Electronic Medication Plans in Switzerland: Lessons Learned From a Participatory Action Research Study.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- The Use of a Decision Support System in Swedish Pharmacies to Identify Potential Drug-Related Problems-Effects of a National Intervention Focused on Reviewing Elderly Patients' Prescriptions.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysicians, patients and others involved need to have accurate information on patients' current drug prescriptions available, and have that information protected from unauthorized access. During the past decade, many counties in Sweden have implemented regionally shared medication lists within health care.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to describe physicians' views on changes in accuracy, availability and confidentiality in the transition from local medication lists to a regionally shared medication list.
settingHealth care units in four different counties of Sweden after the transition from local medication lists to a regionally shared medication list. The shared medication list was an integrated part of the electronic health record system in the respective counties, but the system and implementation process varied.
methodsPhysicians (n = 7) with experience of transition from local medication lists to a regionally shared medication list were interviewed in a semi-structured manner.
main outcome measurePhysicians' views on changes in information risks, focusing on accuracy, availability and confidentiality. Results The transition from local medication lists to a shared medication list increased the availability of information: from being time consuming or not possible to access from other care givers to most information being available in one place. A regionally shared medication list was perceived as having the potential to provide a greater accuracy of information, but not always: the shared medication list was perceived as more complete but with more non-current drugs. On the other hand, a shared medication list implied an increased risk of violating patient privacy, placing greater demands on IT security in order to protect the confidentiality of information.
conclusionPhysicians perceived a regionally shared medication list to increase the availability of information about current prescriptions and potentially the accuracy but may decrease the confidentiality of information. To implement a shared medication list, we recommend providing clear description of responsibilities and routines for normal activities as well as back-up routines, consider IT-security and data protection early, involve patients to improve the accuracy of the list as well as to monitor and evaluate the implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25193264What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.