Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25192986›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2014

Genetic characterization and comparison of Clostridium botulinum isolates from botulism cases in Japan between 2006 and 2011.

Tsuyoshi Kenri, Tsuyoshi Sekizuka, Akihiko Yamamoto, Masaaki Iwaki, Takako Komiya, Takashi Hatakeyama, Hiroshi Nakajima, Motohide Takahashi, Makoto Kuroda, Keigo Shibayama

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  5. The Distinctive Evolution ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ClosingFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Impact ofCurrent opinion in food science · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tsuyoshi KenriDepartment of Bacteriology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan kenri@niid.go.jp.
Tsuyoshi SekizukaLaboratory of Bacterial Genomics, Pathogen Genomics Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihiko YamamotoDepartment of Bacteriology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaaki IwakiDepartment of Bacteriology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Takako KomiyaDepartment of Bacteriology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi HatakeyamaMiyagi Prefectural Institute of Public Health and Environment, Miyagi, Japan.
Hiroshi NakajimaOkayama Prefectural Institute for Environmental Science and Public Health, Okayama, Japan.
Motohide TakahashiDepartment of Bacteriology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Makoto KurodaLaboratory of Bacterial Genomics, Pathogen Genomics Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Keigo ShibayamaDepartment of Bacteriology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic characterization was performed for 10 group I Clostridium botulinum strains isolated from botulism cases in Japan between 2006 and 2011. Of these, 1 was type A, 2 were type B, and 7 were type A(B) {carrying a silent bont/B [bont/(B)] gene} serotype strains, based on botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) production. The type A strain harbored the subtype A1 BoNT gene (bont/A1), which is associated with the ha gene cluster. The type B strains carried bont/B5 or bont/B6 subtype genes. The type A(B) strains carried bont/A1 identical to that of type A(B) strain NCTC2916. However, bont/(B) genes in these strains showed single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) among strains. SNPs at 2 nucleotide positions of bont/(B) enabled classification of the type A(B) strains into 3 groups. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) also provided consistent separation results. In addition, the type A(B) strains were separated into 2 lineages based on their plasmid profiles. One lineage carried a small plasmid (5.9 kb), and another harbored 21-kb plasmids. To obtain more detailed genetic information about the 10 strains, we sequenced their genomes and compared them with 13 group I C. botulinum genomes in a database using whole-genome SNP analysis. This analysis provided high-resolution strain discrimination and enabled us to generate a refined phylogenetic tree that provides effective traceability of botulism cases, as well as bioterrorism materials. In the phylogenetic tree, the subtype B6 strains, Okayama2011 and Osaka05, were distantly separated from the other strains, indicating genomic divergence of subtype B6 strains among group I strains.

Indexed as

BotulismClostridium botulinumElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldGenetic VariationGenotypeHumansJapanMinisatellite RepeatsMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyPlasmidsPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID25192986
PMCPMC4249013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.