Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25192890›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2014

Overexpression of AtDREB1D transcription factor improves drought tolerance in soybean.

Satish K Guttikonda, Babu Valliyodan, Anjanasree K Neelakandan, Lam-Son Phan Tran, Rajesh Kumar, Truyen N Quach, Priyamvada Voothuluru, Juan J Gutierrez-Gonzalez, Donavan L Aldrich, Stephen G Pallardy and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genome-Wide Identification and Transcriptional Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular and biochemical responses of sesame (Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Satish K GuttikondaNational Center for Soybean Biotechnology and Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Babu Valliyodan
Anjanasree K Neelakandan
Lam-Son Phan Tran
Rajesh Kumar
Truyen N Quach
Priyamvada Voothuluru
Juan J Gutierrez-Gonzalez
Donavan L Aldrich
Stephen G Pallardy
Robert E Sharp
Tuan-Hua David Ho
Henry T Nguyen
University of Missouri · USIowa State University · USNational Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources · INRIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science · JPWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drought is one of the major abiotic stresses that affect productivity in soybean (Glycine max L.) Several genes induced by drought stress include functional genes and regulatory transcription factors. The Arabidopsis thaliana DREB1D transcription factor driven by the constitutive and ABA-inducible promoters was introduced into soybean through Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer. Several transgenic lines were generated and molecular analysis was performed to confirm transgene integration. Transgenic plants with an ABA-inducible promoter showed a 1.5- to two-fold increase of transgene expression under severe stress conditions. Under well-watered conditions, transgenic plants with constitutive and ABA-inducible promoters showed reduced total leaf area and shoot biomass compared to non-transgenic plants. No significant differences in root length or root biomass were observed between transgenic and non-transgenic plants under non-stress conditions. When subjected to gradual water deficit, transgenic plants maintained higher relative water content because the transgenic lines used water more slowly as a result of reduced total leaf area. This caused them to wilt slower than non-transgenic plants. Transgenic plants showed differential drought tolerance responses with a significantly higher survival rate compared to non-transgenic plants when subjected to comparable severe water-deficit conditions. Moreover, the transgenic plants also showed improved drought tolerance by maintaining 17-24 % greater leaf cell membrane stability compared to non-transgenic plants. The results demonstrate the feasibility of engineering soybean for enhanced drought tolerance by expressing stress-responsive genes.

Indexed as

DroughtsAdaptation, PhysiologicalArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsGlycine maxPlants, Genetically ModifiedTrans-ActivatorsTransgenesUp-RegulationArabidopsis ProteinsCBF4 protein, ArabidopsisTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID25192890
OpenAlexW2043879891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.