ArticleInternational orthopaedics2015
Acetabular revision arthroplasty using trabecular titanium implants.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conventional Titanium Acetabular Cups vs. Trabecular Titanium Acetabular Cups in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Ten-year Follow-up Clinical and Radiological Results.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2026Article
- The use of porous titanium acetabular augments in primary total hip arthroplasty for hip dysplasia or rapidly destructive coxopathy.Bone & joint open · 2025Article
- The Use of Highly Porous 3-D-Printed Titanium Acetabular Cups in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Acetabular revision with moderate-to-severe bone loss using a trabecular titanium cup-cage construct with impaction grafting.Orthopedic reviews · 2025Article
- Forged to heal: The role of metallic cellular solids in bone tissue engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2023Article
- Standardized 3D-printed trabecular titanium augment and cup for acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a mid-term follow-up study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Survivorship of Allologous Structural Bone Graft at a Minimum of 2 Years When Used to Address Significant Glenoid Bone Loss in Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Computed Tomographic and Clinical Review.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2023Article
- Trabecular titanium cups in hip revision surgery: a systematic review of the literature.Annals of joint · 2023Review
- Trabecular titanium cups in acetabular revision arthroplasty: analysis of 10-year survivorship, restoration of center of rotation and osteointegration.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2022Article
- [Use of custom-made acetabular components (CMAC) as part of a two-stage procedure in patients with severe periacetabular bone loss].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2022Article
- Use of a new off-the-shelf 3D-printed trabecular titanium acetabular cup in Chinese patients undergoing hip revision surgery: Short- to mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Acetabular revision using trabecular titanium (Delta TT) revision cups: A retrospective case series.SICOT-J · 2022Article
- Mid-term outcomes of tantalum cup- a single centre study.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2021Article
- Off-the-shelf 3D printed titanium cups in primary total hip arthroplasty.World journal of orthopedics · 2021Review
- A new 3D printing porous trabecular titanium metal acetabular cup for primary total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up of 92 consecutive patients.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020Article
- Characterization of dimensional, morphological and morphometric features of retrieved 3D-printed acetabular cups for hip arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020Article
- Comparison of the Primary Stability of Porous Tantalum and Titanium Acetabular Revision Constructs.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- In vivo osseointegration of a randomized trabecular titanium structure obtained by an additive manufacturing technique.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2020Article
- Highly porous titanium cup in cementless total hip arthroplasty: registry results at eight years.International orthopaedics · 2019Article
- Comparison of the stability of three fixation techniques between porous metal acetabular components and augments.Bone & joint research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate early results of acetabular revisions of total hip replacement using fully cementless trabecular titanium (TT) acetabular modular implants (Delta Trabecular Titanium, Limacorporate, Udine, Italy).
methodsBetween March 2009 and May 2012 TT was used in 81 revisions. The mean age at the time of revision was 68 years (32-84 years). There were nine patients revised for type 1, 11 for type 2A, 27 for type 2B, six for type 2C, 15 for type 3A and 13 for type 3B acetabular defects according to the Paprosky classification. Frozen morselised bone allografts were used in 53 cases and bulk structural allografts in three cases. Clinical evaluations were made using a modified functional Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score. The mean follow-up period was 38.14 months (24-62 months).
resultsThe mean pre-operative Merle d'Aubigné-Postel functional score was 4.7 and 9.8 at the time of last follow-up. There was one revision due to instability of the acetabular component. A cage system-Delta Revision TT-was successfully used in this case. Three cases with Paprosky type 3B defect showed cranial migration of the acetabular component by 6 mm, but stabilised after six months. No dislocations associated with acetabular surgery have occurred in the cohort. There have been no dissociations of the modular component. A fatigue fracture of the hemispherical module occurred in the revised case. No other hardware mechanical failures have been recorded.
conclusionsTT cups, hemispherical modules and augments facilitate reliable and reproducible biological fixation in acetabular revision surgery with excellent results. Extended follow-up is necessary to evaluate the long-term performance of TT modular implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.