Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25192572›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2014

Using common table expressions to build a scalable Boolean query generator for clinical data warehouses.

Daniel R Harris, Darren W Henderson, Ramakanth Kavuluru, Arnold J Stromberg, Todd R Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Characterizing Basic and Complex Usage of i2b2 at an Academic Medical Center.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  3. Using Closure Tables to Enable Cross-Querying of Ontologies in Database-Driven Applications.... IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics. IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics · 2017
    Article
  4. i2b2t2: Unlocking Visualization for Clinical Research.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel R Harris
Darren W Henderson
Ramakanth Kavuluru
Arnold J Stromberg
Todd R Johnson

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000117 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2012 to 2015
$13.3M
KENTUCKY CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCEUL1RR033173 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2011 to 2011
$3.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000117NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000117NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR033173NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR033173PHS HHS D1BRH20410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a custom, Boolean query generator utilizing common-table expressions (CTEs) that is capable of scaling with big datasets. The generator maps user-defined Boolean queries, such as those interactively created in clinical-research and general-purpose healthcare tools, into SQL. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this generator by integrating our study into the Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) query tool and show that it is capable of scaling. Our custom generator replaces and outperforms the default query generator found within the Clinical Research Chart cell of i2b2. In our experiments, 16 different types of i2b2 queries were identified by varying four constraints: date, frequency, exclusion criteria, and whether selected concepts occurred in the same encounter. We generated nontrivial, random Boolean queries based on these 16 types; the corresponding SQL queries produced by both generators were compared by execution times. The CTE-based solution significantly outperformed the default query generator and provided a much more consistent response time across all query types (M = 2.03, SD = 6.64 versus M = 75.82, SD = 238.88 s). Without costly hardware upgrades, we provide a scalable solution based on CTEs with very promising empirical results centered on performance gains. The evaluation methodology used for this provides a means of profiling clinical data warehouse performance.

Indexed as

Database Management SystemsMedical Informatics ComputingData MiningElectronic Health RecordsHumansModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID25192572
PMCPMC4386600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.