Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25192257›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Usefulness of a Darwinian system in a biotechnological application: evolution of optical window fluorescent protein variants under selective pressure.

Ulrike Schoetz, Nikolaos C Deliolanis, David Ng, Jutta Pauli, Ute Resch-Genger, Enrico Kühn, Steffen Heuer, Wolfgang Beisker, Reinhard W Köster, Horst Zitzelsberger and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ulrike SchoetzDepartment of Radiation Sciences - Research Unit Radiation Cytogenetics, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Munich, Germany.
Nikolaos C DeliolanisInstitute for Biological and Medical Imaging, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Munich, Germany.
David NgResearch Group Cellular Dynamics, Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany.
Jutta PauliBAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Division Biophotonics, Berlin, Germany.
Ute Resch-GengerBAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Division Biophotonics, Berlin, Germany.
Enrico KühnInstitute of Developmental Genetics, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Munich, Germany.
Steffen HeuerDepartment of Radiation Sciences - Research Unit Radiation Cytogenetics, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Munich, Germany.
Wolfgang BeiskerInstitute for Toxicology, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Munich, Germany.
Reinhard W KösterInstitute of Developmental Genetics, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Munich, Germany.
Horst ZitzelsbergerDepartment of Radiation Sciences - Research Unit Radiation Cytogenetics, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Munich, Germany.
Randolph B CaldwellDepartment of Radiation Sciences - Research Unit Radiation Cytogenetics, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Munich, Germany.
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DEFederal Institute For Materials Research and Testing · DEMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With rare exceptions, natural evolution is an extremely slow process. One particularly striking exception in the case of protein evolution is in the natural production of antibodies. Developing B cells activate and diversify their immunoglobulin (Ig) genes by recombination, gene conversion (GC) and somatic hypermutation (SHM). Iterative cycles of hypermutation and selection continue until antibodies of high antigen binding specificity emerge (affinity maturation). The avian B cell line DT40, a cell line which is highly amenable to genetic manipulation and exhibits a high rate of targeted integration, utilizes both GC and SHM. Targeting the DT40's diversification machinery onto transgenes of interest inserted into the Ig loci and coupling selective pressure based on the desired outcome mimics evolution. Here we further demonstrate the usefulness of this platform technology by selectively pressuring a large shift in the spectral properties of the fluorescent protein eqFP615 into the highly stable and advanced optical imaging expediting fluorescent protein Amrose. The method is advantageous as it is time and cost effective and no prior knowledge of the outcome protein's structure is necessary. Amrose was evolved to have high excitation at 633 nm and excitation/emission into the far-red, which is optimal for whole-body and deep tissue imaging as we demonstrate in the zebrafish and mouse model.

Indexed as

Directed Molecular EvolutionProtein EngineeringSelection, GeneticAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBiotechnologyBirdsCell LineEmbryo, NonmammalianGenes, ImmunoglobulinGenetic FitnessLuminescent ProteinsMiceMolecular Sequence DataMutagenesis, Site-DirectedLuminescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25192257
PMCPMC4156574
OpenAlexW2015765406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.