Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25192172›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Diagnostic accuracy of computer-aided detection of pulmonary tuberculosis in chest radiographs: a validation study from sub-Saharan Africa.

Marianne Breuninger, Bram van Ginneken, Rick H H M Philipsen, Francis Mhimbira, Jerry J Hella, Fred Lwilla, Jan van den Hombergh, Amanda Ross, Levan Jugheli, Dirk Wagner and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Artificial intelligence in clinical toxicology in Africa: Emerging applications and barriers.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Marianne BreuningerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland; Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, United Republic of Tanzania; Center for Infectious Diseases and Travel Medicine, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Bram van GinnekenDiagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rick H H M PhilipsenDiagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Francis MhimbiraIfakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, United Republic of Tanzania.
Jerry J HellaIfakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, United Republic of Tanzania.
Fred LwillaIfakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, United Republic of Tanzania.
Jan van den HomberghPharmAccess International, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.
Amanda RossSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Levan JugheliSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland; Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, United Republic of Tanzania; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Dirk WagnerCenter for Infectious Diseases and Travel Medicine, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Klaus ReitherSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland; Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, United Republic of Tanzania; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Ifakara Health Institute · TZUniversity of Basel · CHRadboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChest radiography to diagnose and screen for pulmonary tuberculosis has limitations, especially due to inter-reader variability. Automating the interpretation has the potential to overcome this drawback and to deliver objective and reproducible results. The CAD4TB software is a computer-aided detection system that has shown promising preliminary findings. Evaluation studies in different settings are needed to assess diagnostic accuracy and practicability of use.

methodsCAD4TB was evaluated on chest radiographs of patients with symptoms suggestive of pulmonary tuberculosis enrolled in two cohort studies in Tanzania. All patients were characterized by sputum smear microscopy and culture including subsequent antigen or molecular confirmation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) to determine the reference standard. Chest radiographs were read by the software and two human readers, one expert reader and one clinical officer. The sensitivity and specificity of CAD4TB was depicted using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the area under the curve calculated and the performance of the software compared to the results of human readers.

resultsOf 861 study participants, 194 (23%) were culture-positive for M.tb. The area under the ROC curve of CAD4TB for the detection of culture-positive pulmonary tuberculosis was 0.84 (95% CI 0.80-0.88). CAD4TB was significantly more accurate for the discrimination of smear-positive cases against non TB patients than for smear-negative cases (p-value<0.01). It differentiated better between TB cases and non TB patients among HIV-negative compared to HIV-positive individuals (p<0.01). CAD4TB significantly outperformed the clinical officer, but did not reach the accuracy of the expert reader (p = 0.02), for a tuberculosis specific reading threshold.

conclusionCAD4TB accurately distinguished between the chest radiographs of culture-positive TB cases and controls. Further studies on cost-effectiveness, operational and ethical aspects should determine its place in diagnostic and screening algorithms.

Indexed as

Radiography, ThoracicAdultAfrica South of the SaharaFemaleHIV SeropositivityHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedTuberculosis, PulmonaryYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25192172
PMCPMC4156349
OpenAlexW2046297223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.