Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25192031›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2015

Rurality and dietary patterns: associations in a UK cohort study of 10-year-old children.

Tim T Morris, Kate Northstone

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tim T MorrisSchool of Social and Community Medicine,University of Bristol,Oakfield House,Oakfield Grove,Bristol BS8 2BN,UK.
Kate NorthstoneSchool of Social and Community Medicine,University of Bristol,Oakfield House,Oakfield Grove,Bristol BS8 2BN,UK.
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G9815508Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Wellcome Trust 092731Wellcome Trust 102215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledObjective Despite differences in obesity and ill health between urban and rural areas in the UK being well documented, very little is known about differences in dietary patterns across these areas. The present study aimed to examine whether urban/rural status is associated with dietary patterns in a population-based UK cohort study of children.

designDietary patterns were obtained using principal components analysis and cluster analysis of 3 d diet records collected from children at 10 years of age. Rurality was obtained from the 2001 UK Census urban/rural indicator at the time of dietary assessment. General linear models were used to examine the relationship between rurality and dietary pattern scores from principal components analysis; multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the association between rurality and dietary clusters.

settingThe Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), South West England. SUBJECTS: Children (n 5677) aged 10 years (2817 boys and 2860 girls).

resultsAfter adjustment, increases in rurality were associated with increased scores on the 'health awareness' dietary pattern (β=0·35; 95 % CI 0·14, 0·56; P<0·001 for the most rural compared with the most urban group) and lower scores on the 'packed lunch/snack' dietary pattern (β=-0·39; 95 % CI -0·59, -0·19; P<0·001 for the most rural compared with the most urban group). The odds ratio for participants being in the 'healthy' compared with the 'processed' dietary cluster for the most rural areas was 1·61 (95 % CI 1·05, 2·49; P=0·02) compared with those in the most urban areas.

conclusionsThere is evidence to suggest that differences exist in dietary patterns between rural and urban areas. Similar results were found using two different methods of dietary pattern analysis, showing that children residing in rural households were more likely to consume healthier diets than those in urban households.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorRural PopulationChildCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesDiet RecordsFemaleHumansLinear ModelsLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleNutrition AssessmentPrincipal Component AnalysisSocioeconomic FactorsUnited KingdomCluster analysis

Identifiers

PMID25192031
PMCPMC10271822
OpenAlexW2159339868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.