Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25192006›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Genetic bottlenecks in time and space: reconstructing invasions from contemporary and historical collections.

Eleanor E Dormontt, Michael G Gardner, Martin F Breed, James G Rodger, Peter J Prentis, Andrew J Lowe

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eleanor E DormonttAustralian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Michael G GardnerSchool of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Evolutionary Biology Unit, South Australian Museum, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Martin F BreedAustralian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
James G RodgerCentre for Invasion Biology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Peter J PrentisSchool of Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Andrew J LoweAustralian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herbarium accession data offer a useful historical botanical perspective and have been used to track the spread of plant invasions through time and space. Nevertheless, few studies have utilised this resource for genetic analysis to reconstruct a more complete picture of historical invasion dynamics, including the occurrence of separate introduction events. In this study, we combined nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite analyses of contemporary and historical collections of Senecio madagascariensis, a globally invasive weed first introduced to Australia c. 1918 from its native South Africa. Analysis of nuclear microsatellites, together with temporal spread data and simulations of herbarium voucher sampling, revealed distinct introductions to south-eastern Australia and mid-eastern Australia. Genetic diversity of the south-eastern invasive population was lower than in the native range, but higher than in the mid-eastern invasion. In the invasive range, despite its low resolution, our chloroplast microsatellite data revealed the occurrence of new haplotypes over time, probably as the result of subsequent introduction(s) to Australia from the native range during the latter half of the 20th century. Our work demonstrates how molecular studies of contemporary and historical field collections can be combined to reconstruct a more complete picture of the invasion history of introduced taxa. Further, our study indicates that a survey of contemporary samples only (as undertaken for the majority of invasive species studies) would be insufficient to identify potential source populations and occurrence of multiple introductions.

Indexed as

AustraliaCell NucleusDNA, ChloroplastDNA, PlantGenetic VariationHistory, 20th CenturyIntroduced SpeciesMicrosatellite RepeatsModels, GeneticPhylogeographyPlant WeedsSenecioSouth AfricaDNA, ChloroplastDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID25192006
PMCPMC4156389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.