Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25191640›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2014

Radioembolization of hepatic lesions from a radiobiology and dosimetric perspective.

Marta Cremonesi, Carlo Chiesa, Lidia Strigari, Mahila Ferrari, Francesca Botta, Francesco Guerriero, Concetta De Cicco, Guido Bonomo, Franco Orsi, Lisa Bodei and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. New frontiers in radioembolization.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Predictive value ofEJNMMI research · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marta CremonesiIstituto Europeo di Oncologia , Milan , Italy.
Carlo ChiesaIstituto Nazionale dei Tumori , Milan , Italy.
Lidia StrigariIstituto Nazionale dei Tumori Regina Elena , Rome , Italy.
Mahila FerrariIstituto Europeo di Oncologia , Milan , Italy.
Francesca BottaIstituto Europeo di Oncologia , Milan , Italy.
Francesco GuerrieroIstituto Europeo di Oncologia , Milan , Italy.
Concetta De CiccoIstituti Ospitalieri di Cremona , Cremona , Italy.
Guido BonomoIstituto Europeo di Oncologia , Milan , Italy.
Franco OrsiIstituto Europeo di Oncologia , Milan , Italy.
Lisa BodeiIstituto Europeo di Oncologia , Milan , Italy.
Amalia Di DiaIstituto Candiolo - IRCCS , Candiolo , Italy.
Chiara Maria GranaIstituto Europeo di Oncologia , Milan , Italy.
Roberto OrecchiaIstituto Europeo di Oncologia , Milan , Italy.
European Institute of Oncology · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITCandiolo Cancer Institute · ITIstituti Ospitalieri di Cremona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radioembolization (RE) of liver cancer with (90)Y-microspheres has been applied in the last two decades with notable responses and acceptable toxicity. Two types of microspheres are available, glass and resin, the main difference being the activity/sphere. Generally, administered activities are established by empirical methods and differ for the two types. Treatment planning based on dosimetry is a prerogative of few centers, but has notably gained interest, with evidence of predictive power of dosimetry on toxicity, lesion response, and overall survival (OS). Radiobiological correlations between absorbed doses and toxicity to organs at risk, and tumor response, have been obtained in many clinical studies. Dosimetry methods have evolved from the macroscopic approach at the organ level to voxel analysis, providing absorbed dose spatial distributions and dose-volume histograms (DVH). The well-known effects of the external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), such as the volume effect, underlying disease influence, cumulative damage in parallel organs, and different tolerability of re-treatment, have been observed also in RE, identifying in EBRT a foremost reference to compare with. The radiobiological models - normal tissue complication probability and tumor control probability - and/or the style (DVH concepts) used in EBRT are introduced in RE. Moreover, attention has been paid to the intrinsic different activity distribution of resin and glass spheres at the microscopic scale, with dosimetric and radiobiological consequences. Dedicated studies and mathematical models have developed this issue and explain some clinical evidences, e.g., the shift of dose to higher toxicity thresholds using glass as compared to resin spheres. This paper offers a comprehensive review of the literature incident to dosimetry and radiobiological issues in RE, with the aim to summarize the results and to identify the most useful methods and information that should accompany future studies.

Indexed as

90Y-microspheresdosimetryliver tumorsradiobiologyradioembolization

Identifiers

PMID25191640
PMCPMC4137387
OpenAlexW2086716158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.