Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25191518›Full record

ArticleCytoJournal2014

Utilization of ancillary studies in the cytologic diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic lesions: The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Guidelines.

Lester J Layfield, Hormoz Ehya, Armando C Filie, Ralph H Hruban, Nirag Jhala, Loren Joseph, Philippe Vielh, Martha B Pitman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CytoJournal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. What is the current role of endoscopy in primary sclerosing cholangitis?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation of the SharkCoreEndoscopic ultrasound
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lester J LayfieldAddress: Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Hormoz EhyaDepartment of Pathology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Armando C FilieLaboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA.
Ralph H HrubanThe Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Nirag JhalaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Loren JosephDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Philippe VielhDepartment of Pathology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Martha B PitmanDepartment of Pathology, The Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Cytopathology CoreZICBC011052 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI FILIE, ARMANDO · 2009 to 2025
$30.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology has developed a set of guidelines for pancreatobiliary cytology including indications for endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration, terminology and nomenclature of pancreatobiliary disease, ancillary testing and post-biopsy management. All documents are based on the expertise of the authors, a review of the literature, discussion of the draft document at several national and international meetings and synthesis of selected online comments of the draft document. This document presents the results of these discussions regarding the use of ancillary testing in the cytologic diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic lesions. Currently, fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) appears to be the most clinically relevant ancillary technique for cytology of bile duct strictures. The addition of FISH analysis to routine cytologic evaluation appears to yield the highest sensitivity without loss in specificity. Loss of immunohistochemical staining for the protein product of the SMAD4 gene and positive staining for mesothelin support a diagnosis of ductal adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemical markers for endocrine and exocrine differentiation are sufficient for a diagnosis of endocrine and acinar tumors. Nuclear staining for beta-catenin supports a diagnosis of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm. Cyst fluid analysis for amylase and carcinoembryonic antigen aids in the pre-operative classification of pancreatic cysts. A number of gene mutations (KRAS, GNAS, von Hippel-Lindau, RNF43 and CTNNB1) may be of aid in the diagnosis of cystic neoplasms. Other ancillary techniques do not appear to improve diagnostic sensitivity sufficiently to justify their increased costs.

Indexed as

Ancillary studiesbiliary tractendoscopic ultrasoundfine-needle aspirationmolecular diagnosispancreas

Identifiers

PMID25191518
PMCPMC4153340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.