Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25191437›Full record

ArticleTanaffos2012

Evaluation of occupational exposure of shoe makers to benzene and toluene compounds in shoe manufacturing workshops in East tehran.

Mansour R Azari, Vajihe Hosseini, Mohammad Javad Jafari, Hamid Soori, Parisa Asadi, Seid Mohammad Ali Mousavion

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tanaffos, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Quality of life, lifestyle, and working environment of women in the footwear industry.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mansour R AzariDepartment of Occupational Hygiene, College of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences ; Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.
Vajihe HosseiniDepartment of Occupational Hygiene, College of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.
Mohammad Javad JafariDepartment of Occupational Hygiene, College of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.
Hamid SooriDepartment of Occupational Hygiene, College of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences ; Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.
Parisa AsadiDepartment of Occupational Hygiene, College of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.
Seid Mohammad Ali MousavionSenior Health Expert, Deputy of Health Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShoe making is among the oldest traditional occupations. Hazardous chemical substances such as adhesives containing benzene and toluene are used in the manufacturing process. Due to the lack of studies on exposure of shoemakers to benzene and toluene in Iran, this study was organized aiming at evaluating occupational exposure and risk assessment in shoemakers. MATERIALS AND

methodsOverall, 48 shoemakers (12 workshops) in East Tehran were selected randomly for this study. Personal exposure of shoemakers in four different task groups of cutting, modeling, fitting and finishing was examined during three consecutive months (October, November and December) with different climatic conditions. Sampling and analysis of samples were based on an OSHA method (Method No.12).

resultsThe results of personal monitoring of subjects' exposure to benzene and toluene in each of the three consecutive months (Mean ± standard error) were 1.10± 0.11, 1.37 ± 0.14 and 1.52 ± 0.18ppm, 11.78 ± 1.77, 14.87 ± 1.71 and 16.08 ± 2.31ppm respectively. Due to climatic temperature changes from October to December and restriction of air flow due to closure of windows and shut down of general ventilation systems, a general trend of increased exposure was noticed. However, the difference among these three examinations was not statistically significant. Shoemakers in four task groups did not have statistically significant differences in exposure to benzene and toluene. The severity of shoemaker's exposure to toluene was significantly correlated with the number of manufactured shoes and the amount of glue used for the process.

conclusionConsidering the magnitude of personal exposure of task groups to benzene and toluene which was higher than TLV-TWA and unacceptably high risk of cancer and non-cancerous diseases in these subjects, improvement of work conditions for shoemakers seems imperative.

Indexed as

BenzenePersonal MonitoringRisk assessmentShoemakersToluene

Identifiers

PMID25191437
PMCPMC4153221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.