Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25191332›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2014

Roles for jasmonate- and ethylene-induced transcription factors in the ability of Arabidopsis to respond differentially to damage caused by two insect herbivores.

Erin M Rehrig, Heidi M Appel, A Daniel Jones, Jack C Schultz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Overexpression of aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Transcriptome sequencing ofFrontiers in genetics · 2023
    Article
  10. Inhibition of ethylene involved in resistance toFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. ER Bodies Are Induced byMolecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. TheGenes · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin M RehrigDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, Fitchburg State University Fitchburg, MA, USA.
Heidi M AppelPlant Sciences, Bond Life Sciences Center, The University of Missouri Columbia, MO, USA.
A Daniel JonesDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University East Lansing, MI, USA.
Jack C SchultzPlant Sciences, Bond Life Sciences Center, The University of Missouri Columbia, MO, USA.
University of Missouri · USMichigan State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant responses to insects and wounding involve substantial transcriptional reprogramming that integrates hormonal, metabolic, and physiological events. The ability to respond differentially to various stresses, including wounding, generally involves hormone signaling and trans-acting regulatory factors. Evidence of the importance of transcription factors (TFs) in responses to insects is also accumulating. However, the relationships among hormone signaling, TF activity, and ability to respond specifically to different insects are uncertain. We examined transcriptional and hormonal changes in Arabidopsis thaliana after herbivory by larvae of two lepidopteran species, Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) and Pieris rapae L. over a 24-h time course. Transcriptional responses to the two insects differed and were frequently weaker or absent in response to the specialist P. rapae. Using microarray analysis and qRT-PCR, we found 141 TFs, including many AP2/ERFs (Ethylene Response Factors) and selected defense-related genes, to be differentially regulated in response to the two insect species or wounding. Jasmonic Acid (JA), JA-isoleucine (JA-IL), and ethylene production by Arabidopsis plants increased after attack by both insect species. However, the amounts and timing of ethylene production differed between the two herbivory treatments. Our results support the hypothesis that the different responses to these two insects involve modifications of JA-signaling events and activation of different subsets of ERF TFs, resulting in different degrees of divergence from responses to wounding alone.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisERFsethyleneherbivoryjasmonatetranscription factorswounding

Identifiers

PMID25191332
PMCPMC4137388
OpenAlexW2110299481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.