Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25191324›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2014

Regulatory T-cells in pregnancy: historical perspective, state of the art, and burning questions.

Maria Grazia Ruocco, Gérard Chaouat, Laura Florez, Armand Bensussan, David Klatzmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dynamics ofIndian journal of microbiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Preterm Labor, a Syndrome Attributed to the Combination of External and Internal Factors.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria Grazia RuoccoSorbonne Université, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMRS 959, Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (I3) , Paris , France ; INSERM, UMRS 959, Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (I3) , Paris , France.
Gérard ChaouatINSERM, U 976, Hôpital Saint Louis , Paris , France.
Laura FlorezSorbonne Université, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMRS 959, Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (I3) , Paris , France ; INSERM, UMRS 959, Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (I3) , Paris , France.
Armand BensussanINSERM, U 976, Hôpital Saint Louis , Paris , France.
David KlatzmannSorbonne Université, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMRS 959, Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (I3) , Paris , France ; INSERM, UMRS 959, Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (I3) , Paris , France ; AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Biotherapy (CIC-BTi) and Inflammation-Immunopathology-Biotherapy Department (i2B) , Paris , France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we first revisit the original concept of "suppressor T-cells" in pregnancy, put it in a historical perspective, and then highlight the main data that licensed its resurrection and revision into the concept of "regulatory T-cells" (Tregs) in pregnancy. We review the evidence for a major role of Tregs in murine and human pregnancy and discuss Treg interactions with dendritic and uterine natural killer cells, other players of maternal-fetal tolerance. Finally, we highlight what we consider as the most important questions in the field.

Indexed as

cancer toleranceevolution of the immune systemNK cellssuppressor T-cellsTreg

Identifiers

PMID25191324
PMCPMC4139600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.