ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2014
Whose well-being? Common conceptions and misconceptions in the enhancement debate.
Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Felt embodiment as a motive in flourishing.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Grounded in Biology: Why the Context-Dependency of Psychedelic Drug Effects Means Opportunities, Not Problems for Anthropology and Pharmacology.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- To Overcome Psychiatric Patients' Mind-Brain Dualism, Reifying the Mind Won't Help.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
- Neuroenhancement as Instrumental Drug Use: Putting the Debate in a Different Frame.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
- Hacking the Brain: Dimensions of Cognitive Enhancement.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2019Review
- How Realistic Are the Scientific Assumptions of the Neuroenhancement Debate? Assessing the Pharmacological Optimism and Neuroenhancement Prevalence Hypotheses.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018Article
- Transcranial Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Cognitive Performance of Healthy Minors: A Complex Governance Challenge.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2017Review
- tDCS for Memory Enhancement: Analysis of the Speculative Aspects of Ethical Issues.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.