ArticleHand (New York, N.Y.)2014
A prospective randomized trial comparing the effectiveness of one versus two (staged) corticosteroid injections for the treatment of stenosing tenosynovitis.
Article in Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgery for trigger finger.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Clinical effectiveness of Finger gliding Exercise for patients with trigger fingers receiving steroid injection: a Randomized Clinical Trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness of Contemporary Trigger Finger Treatment Strategies: A Medicare Payer Perspective.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2027Article
- National Benchmarks for the Efficacy of Trigger Finger and the Risk Factors Associated With Failure.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2023Article
- Trigger Finger From Ocean Rowing: An Observational Study.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Observational
- Comparison of Different Dosages and Volumes of Triamcinolone in the Treatment of Stenosing Tenosynovitis: A Prospective, Blinded, Randomized Trial.Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2021Article
- Clinical Care Redesign to Improve Value for Trigger Finger Release: A Before-and-After Quality Improvement Study.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- Corticosteroid injection treatment for dactylitis in psoriatic arthritis.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2021Review
- Injection Techniques for Common Chronic Pain Conditions of the Hand: A Comprehensive Review.Pain and therapy · 2020Review
- What Patient-related Factors are Associated with an Increased Risk of Surgery in Patients with Stenosing Tenosynovitis? A Prospective Study.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2019Article
- Outcome of Percutaneous Release for Trigger Digits in Diabetic and Non-diabetic Patients.Cureus · 2019Article
- Long-Term Effectiveness of Repeat Corticosteroid Injections for Trigger Finger.The Journal of hand surgery · 2017Article
- Trigger Finger? Just Shoot!Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStenosing tenosynovitis or trigger finger is a common clinical condition regularly treated with steroid injections. Varied success is reported at early time points following injection. We present a prospective, randomized IRB-approved study to confirm these findings at a long-term follow-up.
methodsAdult patients presenting with symptoms of stenosing tenosynovitis who agreed to participate were randomized into two groups. Group 1 received an initial injection of triamcinolone and local anesthetic mixture. Group 2 received the same initial injection and an additional staged injection at 6 weeks. The patients were then followed beyond 2 years. If Group 1 patients were still symptomatic at 6 weeks, another injection was given. An additional injection or surgery was defined as treatment failure. DASH scores were obtained at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months.
resultsNinety-seven patients (101 trigger digits) were enrolled in the prospective trial. Fifty-six digits were randomized to the one-injection group versus 45 digits randomized to the two-injection group ("intention to treat analysis"-ITT). After accounting for crossover between the groups, 42 patients received one-injection versus fifty-nine patients receiving two injections ("actual" analysis). Overall failure was the same between the two groups. However, a higher surgery rate was noted for patients having undergone two injections versus one injection [47 % versus 27 % (p < 0.013), ITT]. Diabetes was associated with a higher surgery rate at 1 year within the group of overall failures [56 % versus 37 % (p = 0.0505), ITT]. High baseline DASH score (>40) was associated with a median time of 10 months for failure and 6 months for surgery as per a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (p < 0.005 and p < 0.001, respectively, ITT).
conclusionsAs overall failure of steroid injection for trigger finger is not improved with staged, two-injection treatment, we recommend a single injection initial treatment for trigger finger with a second injection given in cases of recurrence or failure. Diabetes was a risk factor for needing surgery if failure occurred within 1 year. The baseline DASH score is helpful in predicting which patients have a higher chance of failing as well as needing surgery. Level of evidence Prospective, randomized trial, level I.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.