Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25191157›Full record

ReviewHand (New York, N.Y.)2014

Secondary healing of fingertip amputations: a review.

Emily M Krauss, Donald H Lalonde

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04631081 (Occlusive Dressing vs Palmar Pedicular Island Flap in Fingertip Amputation), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04631081 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Occlusive Dressing vs Palmar Pedicular Island Flap in Fingertip Amputation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre de la main - CHUVRan2021 to 2023Enrolled100ConditionsFinger InjuriesArmscoverage of the fingertips with bipedicled palmar island flap, occlusive dressing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Coverage of Fingertip Traumatic Amputation in Lesser Digits With Modified Volar Advancement Flap.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2022
    Article
  15. Secondary Healing of Fingertip Amputations: Simple Wound Care Advice for Patients.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Simple Effective Ways to Care for Skin Wounds and Incisions.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emily M KraussDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, 1796 Summer Street Rm. 4474, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3A7 Canada.
Donald H LalondeDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Saint John Regional Hospital, 400 University Drive, Saint John, New Brunswick E2L 4L2 Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most literature on fingertips reviews new surgical techniques of coverage while many surgeons prefer the results of secondary healing. This article reviews the current best evidence and concepts about secondary healing in fingertip injuries.

Indexed as

Conservative management of fingertip injuryFingertip amputationFingertip injuryFingertip secondary healing

Identifiers

PMID25191157
PMCPMC4152443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.