Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25190813›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2014

Structural insights into the mechanism of negative regulation of single-box high mobility group proteins by the acidic tail domain.

Katherine Stott, Matthew Watson, Mark J Bostock, Simon A Mortensen, Andrew Travers, Klaus D Grasser, Jean O Thomas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine StottFrom the Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, United Kingdom and.
Matthew WatsonFrom the Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, United Kingdom and.
Mark J BostockFrom the Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, United Kingdom and.
Simon A Mortensenthe Department of Cell Biology and Plant Biochemistry, Biochemie-Zentrum Regensburg, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstrasse 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Andrew TraversFrom the Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, United Kingdom and.
Klaus D Grasserthe Department of Cell Biology and Plant Biochemistry, Biochemie-Zentrum Regensburg, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstrasse 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Jean O ThomasFrom the Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, United Kingdom and jot1@cam.ac.uk.
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D002257/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Drosophila and plant (maize) functional counterparts of the abundant vertebrate chromosomal protein HMGB1 (HMG-D and ZmHMGB1, respectively) differ from HMGB1 in having a single HMG box, as well as basic and acidic flanking regions that vary greatly in length and charge. We show that despite these variations, HMG-D and ZmHMGB1 exist in dynamic assemblies in which the basic HMG boxes and linkers associate with their intrinsically disordered, predominantly acidic, tails in a manner analogous to that observed previously for HMGB1. The DNA-binding surfaces of the boxes and linkers are occluded in "auto-inhibited" forms of the protein, which are in equilibrium with transient, more open structures that are "binding-competent." This strongly suggests that the mechanism of auto-inhibition may be a general one. HMG-D and ZmHMGB1 differ from HMGB1 in having phosphorylation sites in their tail and linker regions. In both cases, in vitro phosphorylation of serine residues within the acidic tail stabilizes the assembled form, suggesting another level of regulation for interaction with DNA, chromatin, and other proteins that is not possible for the uniformly acidic (hence unphosphorylatable) tail of HMGB1.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsHigh Mobility Group ProteinsMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyModels, MolecularMutant ProteinsPhosphorylationPlant ProteinsProtein Structure, TertiaryStructure-Activity RelationshipZea maysDrosophila ProteinsHigh Mobility Group ProteinsHmgD protein, DrosophilaMutant ProteinsPlant ProteinsAcidic Regulatory DomainCasein Kinase 2 (CK2)ChromatinHMGB ProteinIntrinsically Disordered ProteinNuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)Paramagnetic Relaxation EnhancementPhosphorylationProtein Kinase CProtein Kinase C (PKC)

Identifiers

PMID25190813
PMCPMC4207994
OpenAlexW2027930539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.