Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25190285›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2014

Dendritic cell-targeted vaccines--hope or hype?

Wolfgang Kastenmüller, Kathrin Kastenmüller, Christian Kurts, Robert A Seder

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. CD40 Ligand Potentiates Immunogenecity ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Glycan-costumed virus-like particles promote type 1 anti-tumor immunity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Recombinant antigen delivery to dendritic cells as a way to improve vaccine design.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023
    Review

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wolfgang KastenmüllerInstitute of Molecular Medicine, University of Bonn, 53105 Bonn, Germany.
Kathrin KastenmüllerInstitute of Experimental Immunology and the Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, University of Bonn, 53105 Bonn, Germany.
Christian KurtsInstitute of Experimental Immunology, University of Bonn, 53105 Bonn, Germany.
Robert A SederCellular Immunology Section, Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-3005, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of an effective vaccine that elicits a strong and durable T cell response against intracellular pathogens and cancer is a challenge. One strategy to enhance the effectiveness of vaccination is by targeting dendritic cells (DCs). In this Opinion article, we discuss existing DC-targeting approaches that induce adaptive immunity. We highlight the crucial issues that need to be addressed to move the field forward and discuss whether targeting DCs could be better than current vaccine approaches.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityAnimalsCancer VaccinesDendritic CellsHumansMiceModels, ImmunologicalNeoplasmsT-LymphocytesT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicVaccinationCancer Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID25190285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.