Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25189927›Full record

ArticleClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2015

Performance measures in dialysis facilities: what is the goal?

Fredric O Finkelstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Development of a person-centered interdisciplinary plan-of-care program for dialysis.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Building an Ideal Quality Metric for ESRD Health Care Delivery.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Quality Measures for Dialysis: Time for a Balanced Scorecard.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fredric O FinkelsteinYale University, New Haven, Connecticut fof@comcast.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the care of patients gets more focused and directed by predetermined standards of care, physicians must not lose sight of the primary focus of their treatment goal-maximizing the quality of life of each patient. Physicians must recognize the uniqueness of each individual's experience and make every effort to understand the domains that are of concern to each patient. In addition, physicians must make sure that this focus is not obscured by the setting of arbitrary standards and targets that lend themselves to easy assessments and reporting by simple laboratory measures or computer-generated data. Finally, physicians must focus on modifying and tailoring treatment to maximize each patient's health-related quality of life.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesGuideline AdherenceHumansKidney Failure, ChronicOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePhysician's RolePractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Quality Indicators, Health CareQuality of LifeRenal DialysisStandard of CareSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcomedialysisperformance measuresquality of life

Identifiers

PMID25189927
PMCPMC4284414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.