Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25189594›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2015

Mi-1.2, an R gene for aphid resistance in tomato, has direct negative effects on a zoophytophagous biocontrol agent, Orius insidiosus.

Godshen R Pallipparambil, Ronald J Sayler, Jeffrey P Shapiro, Jean M G Thomas, Timothy J Kring, Fiona L Goggin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Negative Effects ofInsects · 2023
    Article
  4. Molecular mechanisms of resistance toFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  5. Challenging battles of plants with phloem-feeding insects and prokaryotic pathogens.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  6. Mechanisms of plant-insect interaction.Journal of experimental botany · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Godshen R Pallipparambil319 Agricultural Building, Department of Entomology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Ronald J SaylerPlant Science Building, Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Jeffrey P ShapiroUSDA, ARS, CMAVE, 1700 SW 23 Dr., Gainesville, FL 32608-1069, USA.
Jean M G ThomasUSDA, ARS, CMAVE, 1700 SW 23 Dr., Gainesville, FL 32608-1069, USA.
Timothy J Kring319 Agricultural Building, Department of Entomology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Fiona L Goggin319 Agricultural Building, Department of Entomology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA fgoggin@uark.edu.
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USAgricultural Research Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mi-1.2 is a single dominant gene in tomato that confers race-specific resistance against certain phloem-feeding herbivores including aphids, whiteflies, psyllids, and root-knot nematodes. Few prior studies have considered the potential non-target effects of race-specific resistance genes (R genes), and this paper evaluates the compatibility of Mi-mediated resistance in tomato with a beneficial zoophytophagous predator, Orius insidiosus (Say). In addition to preying on aphids and other pests, this piercing-sucking insect also feeds from the xylem, epidermis, and/or mesophyll, and oviposits within plant tissues. Comparison of O. insidiosus confined to isogenic tomato plants with and without Mi-1.2 revealed that immatures of O. insidiosus had lower survival on resistant plants even when the immatures were provisioned with prey that did not feed on the host plant. Molecular gut content analysis confirmed that adults and immatures of O. insidiosus feed on both resistant (Mi-1.2+) and susceptible (Mi-1.2-) genotypes, and bioassays suggest that resistance does not affect oviposition rates, plant sampling, or prey acceptance by O. insidiosus adults. These results demonstrate a direct negative impact of R-gene-mediated host plant resistance on a non-target beneficial species, and reveal that Mi-mediated resistance can impact organisms that do not feed on phloem sap. Through laser capture microdissection and RT-PCR, Mi-1.2 transcripts were detected in the epidermis and mesophyll as well as the phloem of tomato plants, consistent with our observations that Mi-mediated resistance is active outside the phloem. These results suggest that the mode of action and potential ecological impacts of Mi-mediated resistance are broader than previously assumed.

Indexed as

Genes, PlantPest Control, BiologicalAnimalsAphidsDigestive SystemDisease ResistanceFemaleGene Expression Regulation, PlantHerbivoryHeteropteraOvipositionPlant DiseasesRNA, MessengerSolanum lycopersicumSurvival AnalysisRNA, MessengerBiological controlhost plant resistanceinsect resistanceintegrated pest managementmesophyll feedingMi-1Mi-1.2natural enemyplant defenceR genexylem feeding.

Identifiers

PMID25189594
PMCPMC4286404
OpenAlexW2171764673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.