Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25189152›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2015

Robotic-assisted thermal ablation of liver tumours.

Basri Johan Jeet Abdullah, Chai Hong Yeong, Khean Lee Goh, Boon Koon Yoong, Gwo Fuang Ho, Carolyn Chue Wai Yim, Anjali Kulkarni

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03005756 (Single Center and Exploratory Investigator-initiated Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Needle Guiding Robot System for Radiofrequency Ablation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03005756 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Single Center and Exploratory Investigator-initiated Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Needle Guiding Robot System for Radiofrequency Ablation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsan Medical CenterRan2017 to 2019Enrolled20ConditionsCarcinoma, HepatocellularArmsNeedle guiding robot
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Robotic navigation-assisted percutaneous liver puncture: a pilot study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Robotic Assistance in Percutaneous Liver Ablation Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Lung and Abdominal Biopsies in the Age of Precision Medicine.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Basri Johan Jeet AbdullahDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and University of Malaya Research Imaging Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, basrij@ummc.edu.my.
Chai Hong Yeong
Khean Lee Goh
Boon Koon Yoong
Gwo Fuang Ho
Carolyn Chue Wai Yim
Anjali Kulkarni
University of Malaya · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the technical success, radiation dose, safety and performance level of liver thermal ablation using a computed tomography (CT)-guided robotic positioning system.

methodsRadiofrequency and microwave ablation of liver tumours were performed on 20 patients (40 lesions) with the assistance of a CT-guided robotic positioning system. The accuracy of probe placement, number of readjustments and total radiation dose to each patient were recorded. The performance level was evaluated on a five-point scale (5-1: excellent-poor). The radiation doses were compared against 30 patients with 48 lesions (control) treated without robotic assistance.

resultsThermal ablation was successfully completed in 20 patients with 40 lesions and confirmed on multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT. No procedure related complications were noted in this study. The average number of needle readjustment was 0.8 ± 0.8. The total CT dose (DLP) for the entire robotic assisted thermal ablation was 1382 ± 536 mGy.cm, while the CT fluoroscopic dose (DLP) per lesion was 352 ± 228 mGy.cm. There was no statistically significant (p > 0.05) dose reduction found between the robotic-assisted versus the conventional method.

conclusionThis study revealed that robotic-assisted planning and needle placement appears to be safe, with high accuracy and a comparable radiation dose to patients. KEY POINTS: • Clinical experience on liver thermal ablation using CT-guided robotic system is reported. • The technical success, radiation dose, safety and performance level were assessed. • Thermal ablations were successfully performed, with an average performance score of 4.4/5.0. • Robotic-assisted ablation can potentially increase capabilities of less skilled interventional radiologists. • Cost-effectiveness needs to be proven in further studies.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCatheter AblationFemaleFluoroscopyFollow-Up StudiesHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRoboticsSurgery, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25189152
OpenAlexW2115804506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.