Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25189143›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2014

The impacts of severe perfusion defects, akinetic/dyskinetic segments, and viable myocardium on the accuracy of volumes and LVEF measured by gated ⁹⁹mTc-MIBI SPECT and gated ¹⁸F-FDG PET in patients with left ventricular aneurysm: cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as the reference.

Hongxing Wei, Congna Tian, Thomas H Schindler, Mei Qiu, Minjie Lu, Rui Shen, Yueqin Tian, Shi-hua Zhao, Xiaoli Zhang

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Left-ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from cardiac ECG-gatedJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Objective, observer-independent evaluation of myocardial perfusion and function: role of SPECT.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2022
    Review
  6. Prognostic value of ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with left ventricular aneurysm: A comparative study of medical and surgical treatment.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  7. The feasibility ofQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022
    Article
  8. Assessment of cerebral glucose metabolism in patients with heart failure byJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Putting gated SPECT and PET left ventricular function computations in perspective.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  10. Evaluation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction byJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Impact of revascularization in patients with post-infarction left ventricular aneurysm and ventricular tachyarrhythmia.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evaluation of ECG-gated [(11)C]acetate PET for measuring left ventricular volumes, mass, and myocardial external efficiency.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hongxing WeiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 10037, People's Republic of China.
Congna Tian
Thomas H Schindler
Mei Qiu
Minjie Lu
Rui Shen
Yueqin Tian
Shi-hua Zhao
Xiaoli Zhang
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNHebei General Hospital · CNJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare the accuracy of end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (EDV, ESV) and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) measured by both GSPECT and GPET, using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) as a reference. Furthermore, the impacts of severe perfusion defects, akinetic/dyskinetic segments, and residual viable myocardium on the accuracy of LV functional parameters were investigated.

methodsNinety-six consecutive patients with LV aneurysm and LV dysfunction (LVEF 32 ± 9%) diagnosed by CMR were studied with GSPECT and GPET. EDV, ESV, and LVEF were calculated using QGS software.

resultsCorrelations of volumes were excellent (r 0.81-0.86) and correlation of LVEF was moderate (r 0.65-0.76) between GSPECT vs CMR and between GPET vs CMR. Compared with CMR, ESV was overestimated by GSPECT (P < .01) and underestimated by GPET (P < .0001); EDV was underestimated by GPET (P < .001); LVEF was underestimated by GSPECT but overestimated by GPET (both P < .001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the number of segments with severe perfusion defects (P < .001) was the only independent factor which was correlated to the EDV difference between GSPECT and CMR, the number of akinetic/dyskinetic segments with absent wall thickening (WT) was the only independent factor which was significantly correlated to the differences of ESV and LVEF measurements between GSPECT vs CMR and between GPET vs CMR (P < .0001), respectively. Neither the mismatch score nor the segments with viable myocardium were correlated to the differences of LV volumes and LVEF measurements between different imaging modalities.

conclusionsIn LV aneurysm patients, LV volumes and LVEF measured by both GSPECT and GPET imaging correlated well with those determined by CMR, but should not be interchangeable in individual patients. The accuracy of LVEF measured by GSPECT and GPET was affected by the akinetic/dyskinetic segments with absent WT.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Stroke VolumeTechnetium Tc 99m SestamibiCardiac-Gated Single-Photon Emission Computer-Assisted TomographyCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHeart AneurysmHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityVentricular Dysfunction, LeftFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium Tc 99m Sestamibi

Identifiers

PMID25189143
OpenAlexW2085705368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.