Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25188916›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in lipidology2014

Small entities with large impact: microcalcifications and atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability.

Joshua D Hutcheson, Natalia Maldonado, Elena Aikawa

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in lipidology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. CoronaryCirculation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2020
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Biomechanics of Plaque Rupture and Cardiovascular Calcification.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Considerations on the Development of Therapeutics in Vascular Calcification.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua D HutchesonCardiovascular Medicine, Center for Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular Sciences and Center for Excellence in Vascular Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Natalia Maldonado
Elena Aikawa
Harvard University · US

Funding

HARVARD CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE CENTER (UL1)UL1RR025758 · NCRR · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2008 to 2011
$91.4M
Improving Mitral Compensation in Ischemic RegurgitationR01HL109506 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI AIKAWA, ELENA, BISCHOFF, JOYCE E. · 2012 to 2015
$3.3M
Aortic valve microcalcificationR01HL114805 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI AIKAWA, ELENA · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025758NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL109506NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL109506NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114805NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL114805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAtherosclerotic plaque rupture and subsequent acute events, such as myocardial infarction and stroke, contribute to the majority of cardiovascular-related deaths. Calcification has emerged as a significant predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, challenging previously held notions that calcifications stabilize atherosclerotic plaques. In this review, we address this discrepancy through recent findings that not all calcifications are equivalent in determining plaque stability. RECENT

findingsThe risk associated with calcification is inversely associated with calcification density. As opposed to large calcifications that potentially stabilize the plaque, biomechanical modeling indicates that small microcalcifications within the plaque fibrous cap can lead to sufficient stress accumulation to cause plaque rupture. Microcalcifications appear to derive from matrix vesicles enriched in calcium-binding proteins that are released by cells within the plaque. Clinical detection of microcalcifications has been hampered by the lack of imaging resolution required for in-vivo visualization; however, recent studies have demonstrated promising new techniques to predict the presence of microcalcifications. SUMMARY: Microcalcifications play a major role in destabilizing atherosclerotic plaques. The identification of critical characteristics that lead to instability along with new imaging modalities to detect their presence in vivo may allow early identification and prevention of acute cardiovascular events.

Indexed as

CalcinosisHumansMyocardial InfarctionPlaque, AtheroscleroticStroke

Identifiers

PMID25188916
PMCPMC4166045
OpenAlexW2114769268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.