ArticlePopulation health management2015
Evaluation of a high-risk case management pilot program for Medicare beneficiaries with Medigap coverage.
Article in Population health management, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing inequalities in the primary and secondary outpatient interface: A policy-focused evidence brief.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- [Characteristics and effectiveness of healthcare navigators in innovation fund projects: a scoping review].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026Review
- Limited Medigap Consumer Protections Are Associated With Higher Reenrollment In Medicare Advantage Plans.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2019Article
- Sustainable care coordination: a qualitative study of primary care provider, administrator, and insurer perspectives.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Patient-centred access to health care: a framework analysis of the care interface for frail older adults.BMC geriatrics · 2018Article
- Key Design Considerations When Calculating Cost Savings for Population Health Management Programs in an Observational Setting.Health services research · 2018Observational
- Incorporating Reporting Efforts to Manage and Improve Health and Wellness Programs.Population health management · 2017Article
- Propensity to Succeed: Prioritizing Individuals Most Likely to Benefit from Care Coordination.Population health management · 2015Article
- Population Health Management for Older Adults: Review of Interventions for Promoting Successful Aging Across the Health Continuum.Gerontology & geriatric medicineReview
- Cross-sectional study on user requirements for developing a digital patient navigator app.Digital healthArticle
- Care Coordination Challenges Among High-Needs, High-Costs Older Adults in a Medigap Plan.Professional case managementArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective was to evaluate the 3-year experience of a high-risk case management (HRCM) pilot program for adults with an AARP Medicare Supplement (Medigap) Insurance Plan. Participants were provided in-person visits as well as telephonic and mailed services to improve care coordination from December 1, 2008, to December 31, 2011. Included were adults who had an AARP Medigap Insurance Plan, resided in 1 of 5 pilot states, and had a Hierarchical Condition Category score>3.74, or were referred into the program. Propensity score weighting was used to adjust for case-mix differences among 2015 participants and 7626 qualified but nonparticipating individuals. Participants were in the program an average of 15.4 months. After weighting, multiple regression analyses were used to estimate differences in quality of care and health care expenditures between participants and nonparticipants. Increased duration in the program was associated with fewer hospital readmissions. Additionally, participants were significantly more likely to have recurring office visits and recommended laboratory tests. The program demonstrated $7.7 million in savings over the 3 years, resulting in a return on investment of $1.40 saved for every dollar spent on the program. Savings increased each year from 2009 to 2011 and with longer length of engagement. The majority of savings were realized by the federal Medicare program. This study focused on quality of care and savings for an HRCM program designed solely for Medicare members with Medicare Supplement coverage. This program had a favorable impact on quality of care and demonstrated savings over a 3-year period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.