Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25188408›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Eliminating both canonical and short-patch mismatch repair in Drosophila melanogaster suggests a new meiotic recombination model.

K Nicole Crown, Susan McMahan, Jeff Sekelsky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Loss ofGenetics · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Bloom syndrome helicase in meiosis: Pro-crossover functions of an anti-crossover protein.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2017
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Meiotic Recombination: The Essence of Heredity.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K Nicole CrownDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America; Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Susan McMahanDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America; Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jeff SekelskyDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America; Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Integrated Training in Cancer Model SystemsT32CA009156 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DER, CHANNING J. · 1985 to 2020
$19.7M
Meiotic Recombination in DrosophilaR01GM061252 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SEKELSKY, JEFF J. · 2000 to 2015
$4.1M
Recombination mechanisms of crossover and noncrossover formation in DrosophilaF32GM105118 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CROWN, KIMBERLY NICOLE · 2013 to 2014
$102k
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009156NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM105118NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In most meiotic systems, recombination is essential to form connections between homologs that ensure their accurate segregation from one another. Meiotic recombination is initiated by DNA double-strand breaks that are repaired using the homologous chromosome as a template. Studies of recombination in budding yeast have led to a model in which most early repair intermediates are disassembled to produce noncrossovers. Selected repair events are stabilized so they can proceed to form double-Holliday junction (dHJ) intermediates, which are subsequently resolved into crossovers. This model is supported in yeast by physical isolation of recombination intermediates, but the extent to which it pertains to animals is unknown. We sought to test this model in Drosophila melanogaster by analyzing patterns of heteroduplex DNA (hDNA) in recombination products. Previous attempts to do this have relied on knocking out the canonical mismatch repair (MMR) pathway, but in both yeast and Drosophila the resulting recombination products are complex and difficult to interpret. We show that, in Drosophila, this complexity results from a secondary, short-patch MMR pathway that requires nucleotide excision repair. Knocking out both canonical and short-patch MMR reveals hDNA patterns that reveal that many noncrossovers arise after both ends of the break have engaged with the homolog. Patterns of hDNA in crossovers could be explained by biased resolution of a dHJ; however, considering the noncrossover and crossover results together suggests a model in which a two-end engagement intermediate with unligated HJs can be disassembled by a helicase to a produce noncrossover or nicked by a nuclease to produce a crossover. While some aspects of this model are similar to the model from budding yeast, production of both noncrossovers and crossovers from a single, late intermediate is a fundamental difference that has important implications for crossover control.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromosome SegregationCrossing Over, GeneticDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA, CruciformDNA HelicasesDNA Mismatch RepairDrosophila melanogasterMeiosisNucleic Acid HeteroduplexesDNA, CruciformDNA HelicasesNucleic Acid Heteroduplexes

Identifiers

PMID25188408
PMCPMC4154643
OpenAlexW2129193660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.