Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25188403›Full record

Trial reportNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2014

Inhaler device technique can be improved in older adults through tailored education: findings from a randomised controlled trial.

Melanie A Crane, Christine R Jenkins, Dianne P Goeman, Jo A Douglass

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions to improve inhaler technique for people with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Cost-utility analysis of an intervention designed to reduce the critical handling error of insufficient inspiratory effort.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melanie A CraneSchool of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Christine R JenkinsAirways Group, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, NSW, Australia.
Dianne P GoemanCRC for Asthma and Airways, Royal District Nursing Service, RDNS Institute, St Kilda, VIC, Australia.
Jo A DouglassDepartment of Immunology and Allergy, Royal Melbourne Hospital and the University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the effects of inhaler device technique education on improving inhaler technique in older people with asthma.

methodsIn a randomised controlled trial, device technique education was provided to a sample of 123 adults aged >55 years who had a doctor diagnosis of asthma. The active education group received one-on-one technique coaching, including observation, verbal instruction and physical demonstration at baseline. The passive group received a device-specific instruction pamphlet only. Inhaler technique, including the critical steps for each device type, was assessed and scored according to Australian National Asthma Council (NAC) guidelines. Device technique was scored objectively at baseline and again at 3 and 12 months post education.

resultsThe majority of participants demonstrated poor technique at baseline. Only 11 (21%) of the active intervention group and 7 (16%) of the passive group demonstrated 100% correct technique. By 3 months 26 (48%) of the active group achieved adequate technique. Improvement in technique was observed in the active group at 3 months (P<0.001) and remained significant at 12 months (P<0.001). No statistically significant improvement was observed in the passive group.

conclusionThe provision of active device technique education improves device technique in older adults. Passive education alone fails to achieve any improvement in device technique.

Indexed as

Patient Education as TopicAgedAged, 80 and overAsthmaBronchodilator AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNebulizers and VaporizersSingle-Blind MethodBronchodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID25188403
PMCPMC4373405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.