ArticlePatient safety in surgery2014
Retrospective analysis of incidental non-trauma associated findings in severely injured patients identified by whole-body spiral CT scans.
Article in Patient safety in surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Imaging strategies for patients with multiple and/or severe injuries in the resuscitation room: a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic utility of whole-body computed tomography/pan-scan in trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis study.Emergency radiology · 2024Pooled it
- Classification of incidental findings in polytrauma computed tomography.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- The Utility of Pan-Scan Imaging in Older Patients After Ground-Level Falls: A Comparative Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- CT Utilisation in Emergency Department (ED) Assessment of Patients With Suspected Polytrauma: Impact of a Dedicated Trauma Surgical Team.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Diagnosis of cancer in the Emergency Department: A scoping review.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the Spiral Chest CT Scan Findings in Patients with Multiple Trauma.Bulletin of emergency and trauma · 2023Article
- Does a fall from a standing height warrant computed tomography in an elderly patient with polytrauma?World journal of emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Incidental CT Findings in the Elderly with Low-Energy Falls: Prevalence and Implications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- European Society of Emergency Radiology: guideline on radiological polytrauma imaging and service (short version).Insights into imaging · 2020Article
- Is There a Role for CT Pan-Scans in the Initial Workup of Fragility Fracture Patients?Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2020Article
- Incidental findings on whole-body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system.Acute medicine & surgery · 2019Article
- Assessment of sensitivity of whole body CT for major trauma.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2019Article
- [Relevant incidental findings and iatrogenic injuries : A retrospective analysis of 1165 resuscitation room patients].Der Anaesthesist · 2018Article
- Cardiovascular findings on computed tomography in patients with unclear finding situation and trauma of unknown origin.Medicine · 2017Article
- Detection of unexpected emergency diseases using FDG-PET/CT in oncology patients.Japanese journal of radiology · 2017Article
- Incidental findings in blunt trauma patients: prevalence, follow-up documentation, and risk factors.Emergency radiology · 2017Article
- What's new in emergencies, trauma and shock? Need for a greater debate on "Incidental cranial computed tomography findings".Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shockArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhole-body Computed Tomography (CT) scan today is considered a crucial imaging technique in the diagnostic work-up of polytrauma patients implicating a potential survival benefit. Apart from prompt identification of life threatening injuries this imaging technique provides an additional benefit by diagnosing incidental non-trauma associated medical diseases. These incidental findings might be also life threatening and warrant urgent therapy. The downside of whole-body CT is a relatively high radiation exposure that might result in an increased life time cancer risk. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and type of non trauma associated incidental medical findings in relation to patient age and potential clinical relevance.
methodsBetween January 1(st) 2011 and December 15th 2012, a total of 704 trauma patients were referred to our hospital's emergency room that triggered trauma room alarm according to our trauma mechanism criteria. Of these 534 (75.8%) received a whole-body CT according to our dedicated multiple trauma protocol. Incidental Findings (IF) were assigned in three groups according to their clinical relevance. Category 1: IF with high medical relevance (urgent life threatening conditions, unless treated) needing early investigations and intervention prior to or shortly after hospital discharge. Category 2: IF with intermediate or low medical relevance, warranting further investigations. Category 3: IF without clinical relevance.
resultsOverall 231 IFs (43.3%) were identified, 36 (6.7%) patients had IFs with a high clinical relevance, 48 (9.0%) with a moderate or minor clinical relevance and 147 (27.5%) with no clinical relevance. The distribution of incidental findings with high or moderate relevance according to age showed an incidence of 2.6%, 6.6% and 8.8% for patients younger than 40 years, 40 to 60 years and older than 60 years, respectively.
conclusionWhole-body CT scans of trauma patients demonstrate a high rate of incidental findings. Potentially life-threatening, medical findings were found in approximately every 15th patient, predominantly aged over 40 years and presenting with minor to moderate injuries and an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 10 or less.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.