Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25187778›Full record

ReviewInterventional neurology2013

Ischemia-reperfusion injury in stroke.

May Nour, Fabien Scalzo, David S Liebeskind

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Interventional neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03673241 (A Randomized, Non-Blinded Clinical Trial of a Non-Invasive Perfusion Enhancement System), which is not on this map. Cited by 158 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
158citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03673241 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Non-Blinded Clinical Trial of a Non-Invasive Perfusion Enhancement System (Guardian System) on Motor Recovery and Impact on Length of Stay in Mobility Impaired Ischemic Stroke Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorTurnCare Inc.Ran2018 to 2019Enrolled120ConditionsIschemic StrokeArmsGuardian System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

158 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Remote ischemic conditioning for stroke: A critical systematic review.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Neuroprotective potential ofVeterinary world · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

May NourDepartments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif., USA.
Fabien ScalzoDepartments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif., USA.
David S LiebeskindDepartments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif., USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite ongoing advances in stroke imaging and treatment, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke continue to debilitate patients with devastating outcomes at both the personal and societal levels. While the ultimate goal of therapy in ischemic stroke is geared towards restoration of blood flow, even when mitigation of initial tissue hypoxia is successful, exacerbation of tissue injury may occur in the form of cell death, or alternatively, hemorrhagic transformation of reperfused tissue. Animal models have extensively demonstrated the concept of reperfusion injury at the molecular and cellular levels, yet no study has quantified this effect in stroke patients. These preclinical models have also demonstrated the success of a wide array of neuroprotective strategies at lessening the deleterious effects of reperfusion injury. Serial multimodal imaging may provide a framework for developing therapies for reperfusion injury.

Indexed as

CollateralsIschemia-reperfusion injuryMRINeuroprotectionStroke

Identifiers

PMID25187778
PMCPMC4031777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.