Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25187646›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2014

Video demonstrations seed alternative problem-solving techniques in wild common marmosets.

Tina Gunhold, Andrew Whiten, Thomas Bugnyar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Biological mechanisms for observational learning.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Stick-weaving: Innovative behavior in tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983) · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tina GunholdDepartment of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria tina.gunhold@univie.ac.at.
Andrew WhitenCentre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9JU, UK.
Thomas BugnyarDepartment of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF Y 366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of social learning and tradition formation under field conditions have recently gained momentum, but suffer from the limited control of socio-ecological factors thought to be responsible for transmission patterns. The use of artificial visual stimuli is a potentially powerful tool to overcome some of these problems. Here, in a field experiment, we used video images of unfamiliar conspecifics performing virtual demonstrations of foraging techniques. We tested 12 family groups of wild common marmosets. Six groups received video demonstrations (footage of conspecifics either pulling a drawer open or pushing a lid upwards, in an 'artificial fruit'); the other six groups served as controls (exposed to a static image of a conspecific next to the fruit). Subjects in video groups were more manipulative and successful in opening the fruit than controls; they were also more likely to use the technique they had witnessed and thus could serve as live models for other family members. To our knowledge, this is the first study that used video demonstrations in the wild and demonstrated the potent force of social learning, even from unfamiliar conspecifics, under field conditions.

Indexed as

Association LearningFeeding BehaviorImitative BehaviorSocial BehaviorAnimalsCallithrixDiscrimination LearningFemaleFruitMaleProblem SolvingVideo Recordingfield experimentprimatesseeding informationsocial learningvideo demonstration

Identifiers

PMID25187646
PMCPMC4190960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.