ArticleJournal of virology2014
On the laws of virus spread through cell populations.
Article in Journal of virology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mathematical Modeling of Virus-Mediated Syncytia Formation: Past Successes and Future Directions.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024Review
- HIV Preintegration Transcription and Host Antagonism.Current HIV research · 2023Article
- In vitro and in silico multidimensional modeling of oncolytic tumor virotherapy dynamics.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Tat controls transcriptional persistence of unintegrated HIV genome in primary human macrophages.Virology · 2018Article
- Fighting Cancer with Mathematics and Viruses.Viruses · 2017Review
- Oncolytic potency and reduced virus tumor-specificity in oncolytic virotherapy. A mathematical modelling approach.PloS one · 2017Article
- Computational modeling approaches to the dynamics of oncolytic viruses.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledThe dynamics of viral infections have been investigated extensively, often with a combination of experimental and mathematical approaches. Mathematical descriptions of virus spread through cell populations are well established in the literature and have yielded important insights, yet the formulation of certain fundamental aspects of virus dynamics models remains uncertain and untested. Here, we investigate the process of infection and, in particular, the effect of varying the target cell population size on the number of productively infected cells generated. Using an in vitro single-round HIV-1 infection system, we find that the established modeling framework cannot accurately fit the data. If the model is fit to data with the lowest number of cells and is used to predict data generated with larger cell populations, the model significantly overestimates the number of productively infected cells generated. Interestingly, this deviation becomes stronger under experimental conditions that promote mixing of cells and viruses. The reason for the deviation is that the standard model makes certain oversimplifying assumptions about the fate of viruses that fail to find a cell in their immediate proximity. We derive from stochastic processes a different model that assumes simultaneous access of the virus to multiple target cells. In this scenario, if no cell is available to the virus at its location, it has a chance to interact with other cells, a process that can be promoted by mixing of the populations. This model can accurately fit the experimental data and suggests a new interpretation of mass action in virus dynamics models. IMPORTANCE: Understanding the principles of virus growth through cell populations is of fundamental importance to virology. It helps us make informed decisions about intervention strategies aimed at preventing virus growth, such as drug treatment or vaccination approaches, e.g., in HIV infection, yet considerable uncertainty remains in this respect. An important variable in this context is the number of susceptible cells available for virus replication. How does the number of susceptible cells influence the growth potential of the virus? Besides the importance of such information for clinical responses, a thorough understanding of this is also important for the prediction of virus levels in patients and the estimation of crucial patient parameters through the use of mathematical models. This paper investigates the relationship between target cell availability and the virus growth potential with a combination of experimental and mathematical approaches and provides significant new insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.