Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25187526›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2014

Image-based high-throughput field phenotyping of crop roots.

Alexander Bucksch, James Burridge, Larry M York, Abhiram Das, Eric Nord, Joshua S Weitz, Jonathan P Lynch

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Understanding the genetics of root system architecture in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.].TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. AnFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Improving plant breeding through AI-supported data integration.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexander BuckschSchools of Biology (A.B., A.D. J.S.W.), Interactive Computing (A.B.), and Physics (J.S.W.), Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332; andDepartment of Plant Science (J.B., L.M.Y., E.N., J.P.L.) and Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology (L.M.Y.), Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16801 bucksch@gatech.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1071-5355
James BurridgeSchools of Biology (A.B., A.D. J.S.W.), Interactive Computing (A.B.), and Physics (J.S.W.), Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332; andDepartment of Plant Science (J.B., L.M.Y., E.N., J.P.L.) and Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology (L.M.Y.), Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16801.
Larry M YorkSchools of Biology (A.B., A.D. J.S.W.), Interactive Computing (A.B.), and Physics (J.S.W.), Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332; andDepartment of Plant Science (J.B., L.M.Y., E.N., J.P.L.) and Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology (L.M.Y.), Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16801.
Abhiram DasSchools of Biology (A.B., A.D. J.S.W.), Interactive Computing (A.B.), and Physics (J.S.W.), Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332; andDepartment of Plant Science (J.B., L.M.Y., E.N., J.P.L.) and Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology (L.M.Y.), Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16801.
Eric NordSchools of Biology (A.B., A.D. J.S.W.), Interactive Computing (A.B.), and Physics (J.S.W.), Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332; andDepartment of Plant Science (J.B., L.M.Y., E.N., J.P.L.) and Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology (L.M.Y.), Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16801.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2593-3072
Joshua S WeitzSchools of Biology (A.B., A.D. J.S.W.), Interactive Computing (A.B.), and Physics (J.S.W.), Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332; andDepartment of Plant Science (J.B., L.M.Y., E.N., J.P.L.) and Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology (L.M.Y.), Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16801.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3433-8312
Jonathan P LynchSchools of Biology (A.B., A.D. J.S.W.), Interactive Computing (A.B.), and Physics (J.S.W.), Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332; andDepartment of Plant Science (J.B., L.M.Y., E.N., J.P.L.) and Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology (L.M.Y.), Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16801.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current plant phenotyping technologies to characterize agriculturally relevant traits have been primarily developed for use in laboratory and/or greenhouse conditions. In the case of root architectural traits, this limits phenotyping efforts, largely, to young plants grown in specialized containers and growth media. Hence, novel approaches are required to characterize mature root systems of older plants grown under actual soil conditions in the field. Imaging methods able to address the challenges associated with characterizing mature root systems are rare due, in part, to the greater complexity of mature root systems, including the larger size, overlap, and diversity of root components. Our imaging solution combines a field-imaging protocol and algorithmic approach to analyze mature root systems grown in the field. Via two case studies, we demonstrate how image analysis can be utilized to estimate localized root traits that reliably capture heritable architectural diversity as well as environmentally induced architectural variation of both monocot and dicot plants. In the first study, we show that our algorithms and traits (including 13 novel traits inaccessible to manual estimation) can differentiate nine maize (Zea mays) genotypes 8 weeks after planting. The second study focuses on a diversity panel of 188 cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) genotypes to identify which traits are sufficient to differentiate genotypes even when comparing plants whose harvesting date differs up to 14 d. Overall, we find that automatically derived traits can increase both the speed and reproducibility of the trait estimation pipeline under field conditions.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysCrops, AgriculturalPhenotypePlant RootsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID25187526
PMCPMC4213080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.