Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25187211›Full record

Trial reportBMC research notes2014

A randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a nurse-led palliative care intervention for HIV positive patients on antiretroviral therapy: recruitment, refusal, randomisation and missing data.

Keira Lowther, Irene J Higginson, Victoria Simms, Nancy Gikaara, Aabid Ahmed, Zipporah Ali, Gaudencia Afuande, Hellen Kariuki, Lorraine Sherr, Rachel Jenkins and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC research notes, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01608802 (Phase 3 Trial of Palliative Care for HIV Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01608802 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Phase 3 Trial of Palliative Care for HIV Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing's College LondonRan2011 to 2013Enrolled240ConditionsHIVArmsPalliative care, Standard care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Keira LowtherDepartment of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, Bessemer Road, London SE5 9PJ, UK. keira.lowther@kcl.ac.uk.
Irene J Higginson
Victoria Simms
Nancy Gikaara
Aabid Ahmed
Zipporah Ali
Gaudencia Afuande
Hellen Kariuki
Lorraine Sherr
Rachel Jenkins
Lucy Selman
Richard Harding
King's College London · GBCicely Saunders International · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Nairobi · KE

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the life threatening nature of an HIV diagnosis and the multidimensional problems experienced by this patient population during antiretroviral therapy, the effectiveness of a palliative care approach for HIV positive patients on ART is as yet unknown.

findingsA randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in a sample of 120 HIV positive patients on ART in an urban clinic in Mombasa, Kenya. The intervention was a minimum of seven sessions of multidimensional, person-centred care, given by HIV nurses trained in the palliative care approach over a period of 5 months. Rates of recruitment and refusal, the effectiveness of the randomisation procedure, trial follow-up and attrition and extent of missing data are reported.120 patients (60 randomised to control arm, 60 randomised to intervention arm) were recruited over 5.5 months, with a refusal rate of 55.7%. During the study period, three participants died from cancer, three withdrew (two moved away and one withdrew due to time constraints). All of these patients were in the intervention arm: details are reported. There were five additional missing monthly interviews in both the control and intervention study arm, bringing the total of missing data to 26 data points (4.3%). DISCUSSION: The quality and implications of these data are discussed extensively and openly, including the effect of full and ethical consent procedures, respondent burden, HIV stigma, accurate randomisation, patient safety and the impact of the intervention. Data on recruitment randomisation, attrition and missing data in clinical trials should be routinely reported, in conjunction with the now established practice of publishing study protocols to enhance research integrity, transparency and quality. Transparency is especially important in cross cultural settings, in which the sources of funding and trial design are often not based in the country of data collection. Findings reported can be used to inform future RCTs in this area.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01608802.

Indexed as

Hospice and Palliative Care NursingPatient SelectionTreatment RefusalAnti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsHumansAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID25187211
PMCPMC4161861
OpenAlexW2131383065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.