ArticleJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine2017
Three-dimensional cultures of mouse submandibular and parotid glands: a comparative study.
Article in Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a functional salivary gland tissue chip with potential for high-content drug screening.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Mouse parotid salivary gland organoids for the in vitro study of stem cell radiation response.Oral diseases · 2021Article
- Strategies for Developing Functional Secretory Epithelia from Porcine Salivary Gland Explant Outgrowth Culture Models.Biomolecules · 2019Article
- Tuning Hydrogel Properties to Promote the Assembly of Salivary Gland Spheroids in 3D.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2016Article
- Laminin-111 Peptides Conjugated to Fibrin Hydrogels Promote Formation of Lumen Containing Parotid Gland Cell Clusters.Biomacromolecules · 2016Article
- Stem Cell-Soluble Signals Enhance Multilumen Formation in SMG Cell Clusters.Journal of dental research · 2015Article
- Current trends in salivary gland tight junctions.Tissue barriersReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Freshly isolated salivary cells can be plated on an extracellular matrix, such as growth factor-reduced Matrigel (GFR-MG), to induce the formation of three-dimensional (3D) structures. Cells grown on GFR-MG are able to form round structures with hollow lumina, capable of sustaining amylase expression. In contrast, cells grown on plastic do not exhibit these features. Our recent studies have used mouse parotid gland (PG) cells, grown on different extracellular matrices, as a model for acinar formation. However, PG cells were not able to respond to the secretory agonist carbachol beyond 5 days and did not sustain polarity over time, regardless of the substratum. An alternative option relies in the use of mouse submandibular glands (SMG), which are more anatomically accessible and yield a larger number of cells. We compared SMG and PG cell clusters (partially dissociated glands) for their ability to form hollow round structures, sustain amylase and maintain secretory function when grown on GFR-MG. The results were as follows: (a) SMG cell clusters formed more organized and larger structures than PG cell clusters; (b) both SMG and PG cell clusters maintained α-amylase expression over time; (c) SMG cell clusters maintained agonist-induced secretory responses over time; and (d) SMG cell clusters maintained secretory granules and cell-cell junctions. These results indicate that mouse SMG cell clusters are more amenable for the development of a bioengineered salivary gland than PG cell clusters, as they form more organized and functional structures. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.