ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2014
[Pain-relieving effect of CGRP antagonism on inflammatory pain].
Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioinformatic Analysis of Potential Biomarkers for Spinal Cord-injured Patients with Intractable Neuropathic Pain.The Clinical journal of pain · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is known to play a major role in the pathogenesis of pain syndromes, in particular migraine pain; however, its implication in inflammatory processes is not well known. The CGRP receptor antagonist BIBN4096BS was shown to reduce migraine pain and trigeminal neuronal activity. An analgesic action of this compound can also be found in rats with induced acute inflammation by injection of complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) in one hindpaw. In this model the compound reduced inflammatory pain and spinal neuronal activity. Behavioral experiments (Randall-Selitto test) revealed a reversal of the CFA-induced mechanical hyperalgesia in rats after systemic drug administration. In vivo electrophysiological studies performed in rats injected with CFA using recordings of wide dynamic range neurons in deep dorsal horn layers of the lumbar spinal cord, confirmed a reduction of neuronal activity after systemic drug administration. The same considerable amount of reduction occurred after topical administration onto the paw with resulting systemic plasma concentrations in the low nanomolar range. Spinal administration of BIBN4096BS did not modify the neuronal activity in the CFA model which suggests that peripheral blockade of CGRP receptors by BIBN4096BS significantly alleviates inflammatory pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.