Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25185836›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2014

Transcriptional profiles of bovine in vivo pre-implantation development.

Zongliang Jiang, Jiangwen Sun, Hong Dong, Oscar Luo, Xinbao Zheng, Craig Obergfell, Yong Tang, Jinbo Bi, Rachel O'Neill, Yijun Ruan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 218 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Single-nucleotide RNA mCell reports · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Environmental and external stressors of postejaculatory sperm function.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Current Status of Synthetic Mammalian Embryo Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zongliang Jiang
Jiangwen Sun
Hong Dong
Oscar Luo
Xinbao Zheng
Craig Obergfell
Yong Tang
Jinbo Bi
Rachel O'Neill
Yijun Ruan
Jingbo ChenCenter for Regenerative Biology, Department of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA. chenjb126@126.com.
Xiuchun Cindy Tian
University of Connecticut · USXinjiang Academy of Animal Science · CNJackson Laboratory · US

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI William Carl Skarnes · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring mammalian pre-implantation embryonic development dramatic and orchestrated changes occur in gene transcription. The identification of the complete changes has not been possible until the development of the Next Generation Sequencing Technology.

resultsHere we report comprehensive transcriptome dynamics of single matured bovine oocytes and pre-implantation embryos developed in vivo. Surprisingly, more than half of the estimated 22,000 bovine genes, 11,488 to 12,729 involved in more than 100 pathways, is expressed in oocytes and early embryos. Despite the similarity in the total numbers of genes expressed across stages, the nature of the expressed genes is dramatically different. A total of 2,845 genes were differentially expressed among different stages, of which the largest change was observed between the 4- and 8-cell stages, demonstrating that the bovine embryonic genome is activated at this transition. Additionally, 774 genes were identified as only expressed/highly enriched in particular stages of development, suggesting their stage-specific roles in embryogenesis. Using weighted gene co-expression network analysis, we found 12 stage-specific modules of co-expressed genes that can be used to represent the corresponding stage of development. Furthermore, we identified conserved key members (or hub genes) of the bovine expressed gene networks. Their vast association with other embryonic genes suggests that they may have important regulatory roles in embryo development; yet, the majority of the hub genes are relatively unknown/under-studied in embryos. We also conducted the first comparison of embryonic expression profiles across three mammalian species, human, mouse and bovine, for which RNA-seq data are available. We found that the three species share more maternally deposited genes than embryonic genome activated genes. More importantly, there are more similarities in embryonic transcriptomes between bovine and humans than between humans and mice, demonstrating that bovine embryos are better models for human embryonic development.

conclusionsThis study provides a comprehensive examination of gene activities in bovine embryos and identified little-known potential master regulators of pre-implantation development.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingTranscriptomeAnimalsBlastocystCattleChromosome MappingCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMiceOocytesPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID25185836
PMCPMC4162962
OpenAlexW2168664853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.