ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2014
A functional circuit model of interaural time difference processing.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single Neuron Contributions to the Auditory Brainstem EEG.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Experience-Dependent Plasticity in Nucleus Laminaris of the Barn Owl.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Dynamics of synaptic extracellular field potentials in the nucleus laminaris of the barn owl.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Article
- Contribution of action potentials to the extracellular field potential in the nucleus laminaris of barn owl.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018Article
- Article
- The Binaural Interaction Component in Barn Owl (Tyto alba) Presents few Differences to Mammalian Data.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2016Article
- Maps of interaural delay in the owl's nucleus laminaris.Journal of neurophysiology · 2015Article
- Sound Localization Strategies in Three Predators.Brain, behavior and evolution · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inputs from the two sides of the brain interact to create maps of interaural time difference (ITD) in the nucleus laminaris of birds. How inputs from each side are matched with high temporal precision in ITD-sensitive circuits is unknown, given the differences in input path lengths from each side. To understand this problem in birds, we modeled the geometry of the input axons and their corresponding conduction velocities and latencies. Consistent with existing physiological data, we assumed a common latency up to the border of nucleus laminaris. We analyzed two biological implementations of the model, the single ITD map in chickens and the multiple maps of ITD in barn owls. For binaural inputs, since ipsi- and contralateral initial common latencies were very similar, we could restrict adaptive regulation of conduction velocity to within the nucleus. Other model applications include the simultaneous derivation of multiple conduction velocities from one set of measurements and the demonstration that contours with the same ITD cannot be parallel to the border of nucleus laminaris in the owl. Physiological tests of the predictions of the model demonstrate its validity and robustness. This model may have relevance not only for auditory processing but also for other computational tasks that require adaptive regulation of conduction velocity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.