Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25185750›Full record

ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2015

Bistability, oscillations, and traveling waves in frog egg extracts.

John J Tyson, Bela Novak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

John J TysonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA, tyson@vt.edu.
Bela Novak
University of Oxford · GBVirginia Tech · US

Funding

Stochastic Models of Cell Cycle Regulation in EukaryotesR01GM078989 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI PECCOUD, JEAN M, TYSON, JOHN J. · 2006 to 2018
$5.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5R01 GM078989-08NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mathematical modeling is a powerful tool for unraveling the complexities of the molecular regulatory networks underlying all aspects of cell physiology. To support this claim, we review our experiences modeling the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) network that controls events of the eukaryotic cell cycle. The model was derived from classic experiments on the biochemistry and molecular genetics of CDKs and their partner proteins. Because the dynamical properties of CDK activity depend in large part on positive and negative feedback loops in the regulatory network, it is difficult to predict its behavior by intuitive reasoning alone. Mathematical modeling is the correct tool for reliably determining the properties of the network in comparison with observed properties of dividing cells and for predicting the behavior of the control system under novel conditions. In this review, we describe six unexpected predictions of our 1993 model of the CDK control system in frog egg extracts and the remarkable experiments, performed much later, that verified all six predictions. The dynamical properties of the CDK network are consequences of feedback signals and ultrasensitive responses of regulatory proteins to CDK activity, and we describe the experimental evidence for the predicted ultrasensitivity. This case study illustrates the novel insights that mathematical modeling, analysis, and simulation can provide cell physiologists, and it points the way to a new "dynamical perspective" on molecular cell biology.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsAnuraCell CycleCyclinsFemaleMathematical ConceptsMetabolic Networks and PathwaysOvumCyclins

Identifiers

PMID25185750
PMCPMC4362858
OpenAlexW2047183228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.