ReviewMicrobial cell factories2014
Progress in lactic acid bacterial phage research.
Review in Microbial cell factories, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabiotics Signature through Genome Sequencing and In Vitro Inhibitory Assessment of a NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Characterization ofFood science and biotechnology · 2023Article
- New Effective Method of Lactococcus Genome Editing Using Guide RNA-Directed Transposition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Dairy streptococcal cell wall and exopolysaccharide genome diversity.Microbial genomics · 2022Article
- Comparative Genomic Analysis Reveals Intestinal Habitat Adaptation of Ligilactobacillus equi Rich in Prophage and Degrading CellulaseMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Analysis of Probiotic Bacteria Genomes: Comparison of CRISPR/Cas Systems and Spacer Acquisition Diversity.Indian journal of microbiology · 2022Article
- Host-encoded, cell surface-associated exopolysaccharide required for adsorption and infection by lactococcal P335 phage subtypes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Phages in Anaerobic Systems.Viruses · 2020Review
- A Specific Sugar Moiety in the Lactococcus lactis Cell Wall Pellicle Is Required for Infection by CHPC971, a Member of the Rare 1706 Phage Species.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2019Article
- A comparative genomics approach for identifying host-range determinants in Streptococcus thermophilus bacteriophages.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Article
- Genetic and functional characterisation of the lactococcal P335 phage-host interactions.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Comparative genomics and functional analysis of the 936 group of lactococcal Siphoviridae phages.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- A virulent phage infecting Lactococcus garvieae, with homology to Lactococcus lactis phages.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research on lactic acid bacteria (LAB) has advanced significantly over the past number of decades and these developments have been driven by the parallel advances in technologies such as genomics, bioinformatics, protein expression systems and structural biology, combined with the ever increasing commercial relevance of this group of microorganisms. Some of the more significant and impressive outputs have been in the domain of bacteriophage-host interactions which provides a prime example of the cutting-edge model systems represented by LAB research. Here, we present a retrospective overview of the key advances in LAB phage research including phage-host interactions and co-evolution. We describe how in many instances this knowledge can be pivotal in creating real improvements in the application of LAB cultures in commercial practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.