Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25185496›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2015

Monitoring the abundance and the activity of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in a full-scale nitrifying activated sludge reactor.

Ö Eyice, O Ince, B K Ince

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ö EyiceSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK, CV4 7AL, o.eyice@warwick.ac.uk.
O Ince
B K Ince

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-specific ammonia oxidation rate (AOR) has been suggested to be an indicator of the performance of nitrification reactors and to be used as an operational parameter previously. However, published AOR values change by orders of magnitude and studies investigating full-scale nitrification reactors are limited. Therefore, this study aimed at quantifying ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and estimating their in situ cell-specific AOR in a full-scale activated sludge reactor treating combined domestic and industrial wastewaters. Results showed that cell-specific AOR changed between 5.30 and 9.89 fmol cell(-1) h(-1), although no significant variation in AOB cell numbers were obtained (1.54E + 08 ± 0.22 cell/ml). However, ammonia-removal efficiency varied largely (52-79 %) and was proportional to the cell-specific AOR in the reactor. This suggested that the cell-specific AOR might be the factor affecting the biological ammonia-removal efficiency of nitrification reactors independent of the AOB number. Further investigation is needed to establish an empirical relationship to use cell-specific AOR as a parameter to operate full-scale nitrification systems more effectively.

Indexed as

AmmoniaBacteriaBetaproteobacteriaBioreactorsNitrificationNitrosomonasOxidation-ReductionSewageAmmoniaSewage

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.