Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25185187›Full record

ArticleCancer discovery2014

RADical response puts an exceptional responder in CHKmate: a synthetic lethal curative response to DNA-damaging chemotherapy?

Guang Peng, Scott E Woodman, Gordon B Mills

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer discovery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guang PengDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. gpeng@mdanderson.org.
Scott E WoodmanDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Gordon B MillsDepartment of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Mechanisms of radioresistance and strategies for radiosensitization in ovarian clear cell carcinomaR01CA181663 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Guang Peng · 2016 to 2026
$3.1M
Understanding and Targeting the DNA Repair Network in CancerR00CA149186 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI PENG, GUANG · 2013 to 2015
$664k
Understanding and Targeting the DNA Repair Network in CancerK99CA149186 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI PENG, GUANG · 2011 to 2012
$173k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA149186NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R00 CA149186NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryIn this issue of Cancer Discovery, AI-Ahmadie and colleagues identify a somatic mutation in the RAD50 gene as a likely contributing factor to an unusual curative response to systemic combination therapy employing the DNA-damaging agent irinotecan and a checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor in a patient with recurrent, metastatic small-cell cancer. This study highlights the importance of in-depth analysis of exceptional responders to chemotherapy and targeted therapy in early-phase clinical trials and opens new avenues for developing cancer genome-based combination therapy to improve the efficacy of traditional chemotherapy through synthetically lethal interactions.

Indexed as

MutationAcid Anhydride HydrolasesAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesHumansNeoplasmsAcid Anhydride HydrolasesAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesRAD50 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25185187
PMCPMC4155513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.