Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25185019›Full record

ReviewBMC biology2014

How and why cells grow as rods.

Fred Chang, Kerwyn Casey Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Conserved physical mechanisms of cell and tissue elongation.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Phenotypic and metabolic adaptations ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Feedback linking cell envelope stiffness, curvature, and synthesis enables robust rod-shaped bacterial growth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Microorganisms · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fred Chang
Kerwyn Casey Huang

Funding

TRAINING & OUTREACH COREP50GM107615 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SCOTT, MATTHEW P. · 2013 to 2017
$10.9M
ASSEMBLY AND PLACEMENT OF THE CELL DIVISION RINGR01GM056836 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHANG, FRED · 1998 to 2018
$7.4M
Engineering of cell shape and intracellular organizationDP2OD006466 · OD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, KERWYN C. · 2009 to 2009
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM107615NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM056836NIH HHS DP2 OD006466NIH HHS DP2OD006466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rod is a ubiquitous shape adopted by walled cells from diverse organisms ranging from bacteria to fungi to plants. Although rod-like shapes are found in cells of vastly different sizes and are constructed by diverse mechanisms, the geometric similarities among these shapes across kingdoms suggest that there are common evolutionary advantages, which may result from simple physical principles in combination with chemical and physiological constraints. Here, we review mechanisms of constructing rod-shaped cells and the bases of different biophysical models of morphogenesis, comparing and contrasting model organisms in different kingdoms. We then speculate on possible advantages of the rod shape, and suggest strategies for elucidating the relative importance of each of these advantages.

Indexed as

Cell Growth ProcessesBacteriaCell WallEscherichia coliFungiModels, BiologicalMorphogenesisSchizosaccharomyces

Identifiers

PMID25185019
PMCPMC4243964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.